wellAlbidarned
International Coach
if your speeds and revs don't match you failNow what happens if the bowler decides to change his bowling style? Instead of big ripping off breaks to rollers and straighter balls?
if your speeds and revs don't match you failNow what happens if the bowler decides to change his bowling style? Instead of big ripping off breaks to rollers and straighter balls?
Judge Thokozile Masipa has the option of forgoing a murder conviction in favor of a lesser charge of culpable homicide, meaning he acted in what he thought was self-defense, but was still negligent in shooting Steenkamp.
especially Dennis Lillee.Yeah but tbf some of the seamers who appear to have perfect actions to the naked eye may actually be flexing up to 50 so
tbf this only gives Migara's argument more merit. I doubt many of us expected Ajmal to be that bad, I think my worst case scenario guess would've been 25 degrees or so, not ****ing 40. It shows that guys with clean looking actions may be closer to the limit than we think.Yeah but tbf some of the seamers who appear to have perfect actions to the naked eye may actually be flexing up to 50 so
Oh ****....I knew his action looked bad (and initially cleared by the ICC) but 40 degrees? That is almost 3 times the allowable limit. I never thought it could be this badSo the rumours I'd read elsewhere are true, Ajmal averaged 40 degrees
Nah he's looked bad all the way along, it's only the new way of looking at things, which has been promoted by the likes of Migara, that makes us wonder how bad it really looks. It's always been appalling. Proven completly now. The 2009 Testing needs to be wondered whether that was the kosher one now. Whatever the change this is hugely conclusive. I think the entire "it maybe down to Work-rate and injury" was just trying to downplay how awful the Testing was before. Why didn't they announce the amount right away, they want those previous Tests buried.tbf this only gives Migara's argument more merit. I doubt many of us expected Ajmal to be that bad, I think my worst case scenario guess would've been 25 degrees or so, not ****ing 40. It shows that guys with clean looking actions may be closer to the limit than we think.
It's crazy how he passed in '09. Hopefully it's just the different testing procedures and the disregard to his elbow injury rather than his action slowly deteriorating.
There is no way there is that much discrepancy between the testing methods in that time, the problem is the lack of monitoring and the attitude that being cleared once possibly relaxes the attitude towards someone's action as well as natural deterioration that might occur due to workload or pressure bowling or simply falling into bad habits without the pressure of scrutiny having been cleared once.Nah he's looked bad all the way along, it's only the new way of looking at things, which has been promoted by the likes of Migara, that makes us wonder how bad it really looks. It's always been appalling. Proven completly now. The 2009 Testing needs to be wondered whether that was the kosher one now. Whatever the change this is hugely conclusive. I think the entire "it maybe down to Work-rate and injury" was just trying to downplay how awful the Testing was before. Why didn't they announce the amount right away, they want those previous Tests buried.
BIB Disagree. We've been told to accept scientific evidence for ages, now we disregard it do we?There is no way there is that much discrepancy between the testing methods in that time, the problem is the lack of monitoring and the attitude that being cleared once possibly relaxes the attitude towards someone's action as well as natural deterioration that might occur due to workload or pressure bowling or simply falling into bad habits without the pressure of scrutiny having been cleared once.
Also not really getting why people think successful remedial work is out of the question, 20 degrees might seem like a lot but I honestly don't think it would be that difficult to correct. He might not be quite as potent upon his potential return however.
Yep, a bit like random drug testing. I'd support it given what we just found out.Fair point Grecian. But I don't think most (or any) of us could have predicted the 40 degree straightening with the naked eyes.
It is probably not ridiculous to suggest that we should test a few randomly picked good bowlers with this new system and see what it throws up. Maybe the 15 degrees line will be obliterated.
There are little differences according to the ICC but not, they insist, to a degree that would be the difference in this case between his action being cleared or not. Ajmal has not marginally gone over the accepted limits; in all his different types of deliveries, he has transgressed significantly enough for minimal differences in testing procedures to not matter.