• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ajmal Action Reported

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Have never had any doubt whatsoever that Ajmal chucks it. Don't know how much I expected Ajmal to chuck it, didn't expect it to be 40 degrees, no, but he's always looked bad. Even if the bowlers with clean looking actions might be chucking, I have a very, very hard time buying that they'd be pushing close to 30-40. There is an illusion, but the illusion can't be that massive, surely.

Random tests before tournaments can help a great deal.
 

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
So how do you view a guy like Ajmal now? Is his career completely null and void?
Not sure, probably best not to judge it now, was great to watch on form. Let's see how other bowlers come out of the new reckoning first.

Just got a nagging feeling he may have not been totally honest with the way he bowled in that first evaluation. The sleeve thing doesn't help either.
 
Last edited:

91Jmay

International Coach
I'm not surprised by 40 degrees after that picture that Vaughan (despite being a wanker) posted on twitter. It was a baseball pitched, not bowled.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I'm not surprised by 40 degrees after that picture that Vaughan (despite being a wanker) posted on twitter. It was a baseball pitched, not bowled.
Yeah, that looked so bad. Even I, having defended the illusion theory a lot on here, was taken aback.

BoLcp-UIQAAlEKh.jpg

I mean, yeah, it's a still image from a front on angle, but the angle of his elbow was so ridiculous, there had to be extensive straightening before he released the ball, it's just inevitable.
 

watson

Banned
Seems comprehensive enough.

1st over, offspin over the wicket: Average elbow extension 39 degrees
2nd over, offspin over the wicket: 37 degrees
3rd over, offspin around the wicket: 41 degrees
4th over, offspin around the wicket (wide of the crease): 41 degrees
5th over, offspin around the wicket: 42 degrees
6th over, doosra around the wicket: 40 degrees
7th over, quicker balls around the wicket: 38 degrees
8th over, quicker balls over the wicket: 42 degrees

Pakistan Cricket News: Saeed Ajmal's flex more than twice legal limit - ICC report | ESPN Cricinfo
 

wellAlbidarned

International Coach
Watching over old videos, I'm not sure why people are saying his action looks the same. It's changed massively imo, used to be much smoother with less pause and only a subtle elbow kink
 

wellAlbidarned

International Coach

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah, it looks a lot worse as you go through his career highlights. Five years is a pretty long time, so it would've been pretty hard to spot if it was a gradual change.

Also, you have to remember Gould didn't report him because he suddenly felt like it. He'd umpired him a lot before so he probably felt it looked worse.
 

Top