• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Jonbrooks chucking Megathread

watson

watson

Banned
sledger said:
The time has come to tell you all something very personal. I keep my ear to the ground and I hear everything everybody says. And for the past god knows how many years the word cheater has been completely misunderstood and misused. It doesn't seem anybody on all of CW understands what it means; anybody on this forum doesn't understand what a cheater is and how to identify one. Basically what identifying a cheater is all about in its truest form is the truth. It's honesty. You boil it down and then the essence of a identifying a cheater is exactly what all of you lack, honesty. Seems the perception of me is somebody who is a little disgruntled and sat down at my computer tonight and aired his grievances and said 'cheater'. I became the voice of the voiceless.

Now, I'm the most honest guy on this forum because everybody else has got the same, old, tired crybaby story. They'll come on here and they'll say 'He didn't mean to do it, he didn't know he was doing it. Let's hear it for Ajmal!' Here's some honesty. There's good guys and there's bad guys on this forum and make no mistake about it, ladies and gentlemen, I am a bad, bad man and I can freely admit it. But so many of you will come on here and you'll cry your eyes out, clench your filthy fat little hands in anguish, and say 'He didn't know, leave him alone'. Now, these people, these posters are either weak or they're dishonest and they're liars. It's either one or the other. But I'm neither weak nor dishonest. I'm the best poster on this entire ****ing board.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't say that you're the 'best poster', but your contribution is certainly noticed and appreciated, and the forum would be diminished without your insight.

The fact that you are wrong is therefore neither here nor there.
 
sledger

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
watson said:
I wouldn't say that you're the 'best poster', but your contribution is certainly noticed and appreciated, and the forum would be diminished without your insight.

The fact that you are wrong is therefore neither here nor there.
Click to expand...
Holy **** I hope this post is serious.
 
BoyBrumby

BoyBrumby

Englishman
I think anyone who is minded to has had a mental asterisk beside his record for a long time now.

I'm agnostic. I lean towards giving him the benefit of the doubt because of his unique genetics; the real malign influence he had on our sport was in his bastard progeny who attempted to copy his style of bowling without his physical gifts.

As baseball had a "dead ball" era of about twenty years, I think in retrospect 94-14 might be seen as cricket's "bent arm" era.
 
morgieb

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
OK just read this whole thread. sledger WAG. Turned something dire into something great.
 
hendrix

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
This is just trolling by the OP at this point.

Murali hasn't said anything controversial whatsoever. His deliveries were shown to be within the 15 degree threshold, Ajmal's were nearly 3 times that.
 
YorksLanka

YorksLanka

International Debutant
Not sure about that but I bet he will be getting paid, something that isn't always guaranteed by SLC !!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top