I always knew you didn't speak English up there
Embellishing =/= Lying. Get what you were talking about there CabinetSo Jadeja lied in his testimony which also swung the decision.
Should have done it after Lords, pointless nowI think India should refuse to play and call off the tour.
Assuming he was fit, I wouldn't have dropped him for Southampton (or Plunkett either), but both apparently aren't 100%, obviously. Why take the chance?Old Trafford would suit Stokes as well and if you pick a guy in an original squad and have to call someone in as cover then you should be picking the original guy before the cover. Not that it follows with England of course who regularly contradict themselves by picking emergency cover players ahead of the original squad.
Nah, Embellishing is lying. Inventing parts of the story that didn't happen.Embellishing =/= Lying. Get what you were talking about there Cabinet
Jordan needs dropping, don't see how him playing whilst being so lacking match practise is going to do anything for his confidence, let him get back to Sussex. Finn has been taking wickets, not sure how he's been bowling though.I think we'll drop Jordan in order to complete the full destruction of his confidence and Finn will play
Embellishing means adding to the story, not inventing.Nah, Embellishing is lying. Inventing parts of the story that didn't happen.
yes it means 'adding' things that didn't happen to the story. Yep, he changed his story thus undermining its credibility in any way.Embellishing means adding to the story, not inventing.
Plus, I am pretty sure that Jadeja said he didn't turn back aggressively to get his fine turned back on appeal (advised by lawyers etc).
Ironic that the "turned back aggressively" is fined, but not the "in self-defense push".
If we hadn't dropped CJ the first time round, I'd agree but you can't drop a player after one test in a series, bring him back for one test and then drop him again.Jordan needs dropping, don't see how him playing whilst being so lacking match practise is going to do anything for his confidence, let him get back to Sussex. Finn has been taking wickets, not sure how he's been bowling though.
You are inventing this meaning out of thin air (adding things to the story which are often not true, not always not true, is the meaning).yes it means 'adding' things that didn't happen to the story. Yep, he changed his story thus undermining its credibility in any way.
Yeah, problem is they have made so many mistakes in selection either way they are compounded their bad errors.If we hadn't dropped CJ the first time round, I'd agree but you can't drop a player after one test in a series, bring him back for one test and then drop him again.
The selectors need to hold their nerve with him because we don't have great bowling stocks at the moment and we need to stop destroying new bowlers confidence by bringing them in and dropping them so easily
Oh god, give it up. Neither should be fined, it was a nothing incident cooked up to get Anderson out of the rest of the series. Dhoni was so morally unshakeable in his pursuit of justice he let Jadeja change his story to avoid punishment.A) The only thing known for certain - Anderson pushed him (whether maliciously or in self-defense).
B) Not known for certain - Whether Jadeja turned around aggressively or not.
If you don't fine A, you have no business fining B.
I agree with you, which you don't seem to get. I am not pushing on that.Oh god, give it up. Neither should be fined, it was a nothing incident cooked up to get Anderson out of the rest of the series. Dhoni was so morally unshakeable in his pursuit of justice he let Jadeja change his story to avoid punishment.