• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** India in England 2014

Jassy

Banned
Clouderson is a total cry baby and even English fans acknowledge that. Went crying to the umpire when Bailey said a few words to him but he himself has no qualms sledging blokes even after the cricket is over. Can't wait till his next subcontinent tour or the Ashes.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Old Trafford would suit Stokes as well and if you pick a guy in an original squad and have to call someone in as cover then you should be picking the original guy before the cover. Not that it follows with England of course who regularly contradict themselves by picking emergency cover players ahead of the original squad.
Assuming he was fit, I wouldn't have dropped him for Southampton (or Plunkett either), but both apparently aren't 100%, obviously. Why take the chance?
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I only heard about Plunkett being rested. Nothing about Stokes. I think he was just dropped, plain and simple. Should get back his place IMO.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Well, if it's being reported in the national press his left foot is fecked I'm inclined to believe there's something in it.
 

Johann

School Boy/Girl Captain
I think we'll drop Jordan in order to complete the full destruction of his confidence and Finn will play
 

91Jmay

International Coach
I think we'll drop Jordan in order to complete the full destruction of his confidence and Finn will play
Jordan needs dropping, don't see how him playing whilst being so lacking match practise is going to do anything for his confidence, let him get back to Sussex. Finn has been taking wickets, not sure how he's been bowling though.
 
Last edited:

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Nah, Embellishing is lying. Inventing parts of the story that didn't happen.
Embellishing means adding to the story, not inventing.

Plus, I am pretty sure that Jadeja said he didn't turn back aggressively to get his fine turned back on appeal (advised by lawyers etc).

Ironic that the "turned back aggressively" is fined, but not the "in self-defense push".
 

91Jmay

International Coach
Embellishing means adding to the story, not inventing.

Plus, I am pretty sure that Jadeja said he didn't turn back aggressively to get his fine turned back on appeal (advised by lawyers etc).

Ironic that the "turned back aggressively" is fined, but not the "in self-defense push".
:laugh: yes it means 'adding' things that didn't happen to the story. Yep, he changed his story thus undermining its credibility in any way.
 

Johann

School Boy/Girl Captain
Jordan needs dropping, don't see how him playing whilst being so lacking match practise is going to do anything for his confidence, let him get back to Sussex. Finn has been taking wickets, not sure how he's been bowling though.
If we hadn't dropped CJ the first time round, I'd agree but you can't drop a player after one test in a series, bring him back for one test and then drop him again.

The selectors need to hold their nerve with him because we don't have great bowling stocks at the moment and we need to stop destroying new bowlers confidence by bringing them in and dropping them so easily
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
:laugh: yes it means 'adding' things that didn't happen to the story. Yep, he changed his story thus undermining its credibility in any way.
You are inventing this meaning out of thin air (adding things to the story which are often not true, not always not true, is the meaning).

If he hadn't changed his story, he would have been the only one to face any punishment whatsoever for this incident. The only ones who undermined their credibility were the ICC judicial committee :)
 
Last edited:

91Jmay

International Coach
If we hadn't dropped CJ the first time round, I'd agree but you can't drop a player after one test in a series, bring him back for one test and then drop him again.

The selectors need to hold their nerve with him because we don't have great bowling stocks at the moment and we need to stop destroying new bowlers confidence by bringing them in and dropping them so easily
Yeah, problem is they have made so many mistakes in selection either way they are compounded their bad errors.
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
A) Thing known for certain - Anderson pushed him (whether maliciously or in self-defense).

B) Not known for certain - Whether Jadeja turned around aggressively or not.

If you don't fine A, you have no business fining B.
 
Last edited:

91Jmay

International Coach
A) The only thing known for certain - Anderson pushed him (whether maliciously or in self-defense).

B) Not known for certain - Whether Jadeja turned around aggressively or not.

If you don't fine A, you have no business fining B.
Oh god, give it up. Neither should be fined, it was a nothing incident cooked up to get Anderson out of the rest of the series. Dhoni was so morally unshakeable in his pursuit of justice he let Jadeja change his story to avoid punishment.
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Oh god, give it up. Neither should be fined, it was a nothing incident cooked up to get Anderson out of the rest of the series. Dhoni was so morally unshakeable in his pursuit of justice he let Jadeja change his story to avoid punishment.
I agree with you, which you don't seem to get. I am not pushing on that.

But the fact is Jadeja was fined. Hence by (A,B) analogy. The geniuses at ICC were responsible for Jadeja having to change his story, not Dhoni.

If Dhoni had to do something like that, he would have done it in 2011, when we didn't have a chance, as compared to now. Stop being a dick to India. We haven't done things like this under Dhoni, or for that matter, any other captain.

Anderson is a giant ****, much bigger than Jadeja, whether you like to admit it or not. Look to your own issues before coming down on the Indian team's morality.
 
Last edited:

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Jimmy Anderson is a top bloke and a northerner to boot. Would rather share a beer with him than Jadeja any day.
 

G.I.Joe

International Coach
Woah, let's not go overboard here. Anderson is a dick of the highest order and extremely lucky that a camera happened to be switched off. Oh, and since we're on the internet, you'll have to imagine air quotes for the last couple of words there.
 

Top