I wouldn't have, he hasn't scored big this tour but he's provided reasonable starts, also Dhawan is more than likely going to be our main opener come the world cup so I don't see why they would drop him. Still even if they wanted to drop him they should have played Rahane as the opener instead of Kohli.Would you have dropped Dhawan incidentally ?
Yuppers, India missed a trick opening with Kohli. Some will claim there's no difference between opening and batting at 3, but there is. Psychologically as much as anything else.I wouldn't have, he hasn't scored big this tour but he's provided reasonable starts, also Dhawan is more than likely going to be our main opener come the world cup so I don't see why they would drop him. Still even if they wanted to drop him they should have played Rahane as the opener instead of Kohli.
o rly?Physiologically
Pretty sure that's who he meant when he said Ronin. Even if there was a player called Ronin Singh, which I don't think there was, "Ronin" doesn't qualify as a western name anyway. Was a typo I reckon.
Yep typo.Correct.
So much trolling from you at me lately with Rafa and now this. You really must want that steak.Remember when Jono said it was no longer the case that Indian batsmen couldn't handle the short ball?
Cheerso rly?
Haha, amazing to think that his average has actually dropped this series.Incidentally, does Dhoni ever get out cheaply in ODIs? It almost seems an inevitability that he'll get a 50, the only question seems to be whether he'll convert it into a match-winning 100 or not.
Indeed, averaging a paltry 51 this series.Haha, amazing to think that his average has actually dropped this series.
It really is mental. The only criticism I'd lay on his opposition is they rarely attack him enough for mine. It would take a courageous skipper to set a very attacking field to him mind.He averages 57 as captain in ODIs. How is that even possible?