• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** West Indies in New Zealand 2013/14

_Ed_

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Thought this was interesting.

Ah, the things that entertain me while I'm at work.
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
Thought this was interesting.

Ah, the things that entertain me while I'm at work.
Yes I've been watching those mirroring each other - not just runs but wickets too.

Ooh wicket in Adelaide... one more coming up here then.
 

KiWiNiNjA

International Coach
cricinfo said:
replays cast some doubt as to whether the ball hit bat or pad first but eventually appear to go in favour of the pad
Seriously? You could see from the very first replay that it hit pad first.

With that and the "doubt" over whether it hit Bravo's glove or not. Jeez, the world is full of ijits.
 

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
The non-partisan cricinfo commentators generally tend to avoid criticism of the umpires.

If Sodhi could learn how to bowl the slider or the flipper accurately he'd be a massive handfull with his height.
 
Last edited:

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
Seriously? You could see from the very first replay that it hit pad first.

With that and the "doubt" over whether it hit Bravo's glove or not. Jeez, the world is full of ijits.
The third umpire took ages to decide about that for some strange reason.
 

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
While I still don't think Sodhi should be playing international cricket yet, I don't think I've ever seen any New Zealand spin bowler make two quality international batsmen look so clueless. Great signs for his future.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
I'm not really surprised considering the Bravo review, but you'd think someone would need only 2 or 3 views at most, not 12 or whatever it was.
Maybe tells us something about the ability of the (relatively old) ICC umpires.
 
Last edited:

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
Maybe tells as something about the ability of the (relatively old) ICC umpires.
Probably similar to the commentary team on the radio - Glenn Turner being his old curmudgeonly self complaining about them newfangled technologies and the other guy who sounds younger agreeing with him. Previously they were tut-tutting about kids these days playing on their ipads instead of outside.

In more positive news, radiosport's advertisements are vastly less obnoxious and embarrassing than last time I listened to it.
 

Top