This isn't a good reason. Everyone else doing it is such a bad reason for doing anything.The short answer is that everyone knows that waiting for the umpire's decision is just the done thing but claiming a dropped catch isn't.
Yes it does. There's been an arbitrary consensus for many viewpoints (still is for some viewpoints) which we in the modern western world would find wrong or abhorrent. Why is this any different? An "arbitrary consensus" is never satisfactory on its own.There's a consensus, it doesn't matter if it's an arbitrary one.
I presume all the talk at the presser for Clarke would have been the Broad thing. Anyone got a link to what, if anything, he said?
Surely he didn't say that?Lol Dar. If you can't see that what exactly can you see?
Cant believe that the ball tracker had it missing by as much as it did thoughJust saw some highlights including that Bell lbw which was rightly overturned on review. It looked stone dead on first viewing didn't it?
Stuart Clark on FSN - bloke a genuine media talent. Very good analyst.
Gooing to be tough against Anderson and Swann. But Clarke going crazy again could definitely be on the cards.Yeah, it depends if we can strike early tonight. A score around 300 won't be easy but the pitch is flattening out (witness how well we've bowled generally without much rewards) and Clarke seems due to go crazy again. Could happen but anything above 350+ is probably unchasable.
Daemon, WAC. He's always right about the batsmen that score big runs against Australia. The ones you least expect, too.
No he didn'y keep his cool as it was occurring but in the over after and straight after Haddin drops Bell he's all motivationHahahahaha. Just seen Broad's edge. That's ridiculous. I'm not too sure I'd say Clarke kept his cool either. Unbelievable.
Yeah Clarke and Haddin made a mistake there. I think its a bit hard on Broad, Dar should have given that out, its not Broad's fault for standing his ground IMOStuart broad is an absolute tosser of monumental proportions, and dar is having a nightmare, but at the end of the day this is really clarke's fault for being so reckless with his reviews.