• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** New Zealand in England series 2013

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Supposed to be sharpish, isn't he?
Yeah he's not a medium pacer but neither is Dernbach. Dernbach is quicker and younger than Rankin and Dernbach is **** so it doesn't mean much.

Never really been a Rankin fan at all. He gave Ireland something a bit different that most other associates don't have in a someone who could push his speed up to the low 140s and get awkward bounce, which made him an important part of the attack. He just made the bowling attack feel more 'real'. However, he was consistently out-performed in the side by a one time Sheffield Shield medium pacer who was in his late 30s.

Weird pick.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Supposed to be sharpish, isn't he?
Yeah he's quick and 6"7 so he gets a lot of bounce. He's definitely a loss for Ireland but he never quite lived up to his potential for us. For whatever reason part-timers like Botha, Cusack and Johnston always got the job done a lot better.

I wouldn't have had him opening the bowling. He didn't swing it and the fielding restrictions exposed his lack of accuracy. I think having our part-timers nipping it around early on and then bringing in Rankin to prevent batsmen from settling in the middle overs would have worked better. It works great for Morne Morkel, who's a very similar style of bowler. But that's not really the orthodoxy and he might even have objected to being held back behind the dobblers.
 
Last edited:

theegyptian

International Vice-Captain
Rankin illustrates the point. Better fc bowler than odi bowler. shouldn't be anywhere near the odi team. Said in the domestic thread earlier today (before this callup) that I could see him touring australia if(big if) he stays fit. ugly bowler to face. Similiar to Harmison - can be erratic, can be a beast.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Rankin illustrates the point. Better fc bowler than odi bowler. shouldn't be anywhere near the odi team. Said in the domestic thread earlier today (before this callup) that I could see him touring australia if(big if) he stays fit. ugly bowler to face. Similiar to Harmison - can be erratic, can be a beast.
Yeah Harmison is a very apt comparison in style, but I don't think he's quite in the same class.

I noticed Harmison made his comeback for Durham 2's a couple of weeks ago; should just recall him instead. :ph34r:
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
Nice score to wake up to. I see Super-Guptill has made an appearance in place of Clark **** Kent now the pyjamas are on. Looks to be the winning of this game, with Elliott batting nicely too.

Eh, that's not out is it?
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Yeah it's a handier player type for ODIs. Ireland sometimes just pick 10 of them plus a wicket keeper.

But Bresnan isn't a million miles away from Woakes and they're a big fan of him in tests. And if he's only playing ODIs his style of bowling will probably move towards that of someone like Dernbach, so it seems like a waste of a potentially very useful test cricketer. I guess it comes back to the whole thing about pace at the highest level.
I don't think Woakes and Bresnan are really an apt comparison anymore. Woakes has a very good overall First Class bowling record but that average has been blowing out more and more since last injury, while his batting has come on leaps and bounds. I think Bresnan is seen to be a level or two above Woakes on the bowling front; he makes the Test side as a specialist bowler with his batting seen as a bonus or tie-breaker in selection.

If Woakes is going to play Tests I think it's going to have to be as a batsman as much or even more than as a bowler, batting at seven.

I don't think it's actually a matter of pace either. Woakes actually looks a little quicker to me now than when I first saw him; he's consistently low to mid 80s which is fine. There's just not enough to his bowling.
 

pskov

International 12th Man
If Rankin plays in this series for England but is dropped and never selected after, does that mean he won't have enough time to requalify for Ireland before the World Cup?
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
If Rankin plays in this series for England but is dropped and never selected after, does that mean he won't have enough time to requalify for Ireland before the World Cup?
Indeed, but he's already retired from Ireland duty anyway so it's a moot point. He's not gonna play regardless.
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Eng should just pick Onions for odis and be done with it

Sure, he's a better longer format bowler but it is a real insult to him to have guys like Dernbach selected in front of him for odis

After all, he was considered to be surplus to requirements after 4 games with an e/r of 5 yet Dernbach has played 6 times as many matches with an e/r of well over 6

At the risk of sounding like Scaly <shudder> that is ****ed
 

BeeGee

International Captain
Elliot is a perfect no. 5 for NZ. Accumulates well and is adept at rebuilding an innings after an early collapse.

Edit: should have kept my stupid mouth shut. Dumbass.
 
Last edited:

Top