• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** Pakistan in Sri Lanka 2012

AndyZaltzHair

Hall of Fame Member
Sami not bowling means Pakistan is one bowler short apparently, tactics are more hard to understand now for such early declaration if Misbah didn't have Sami in mind for bowling
 

stumpski

International Captain
Sami not bowling means Pakistan is one bowler short apparently, tactics are more hard to understand now for such early declaration if Misbah didn't have Sami in mind for bowling
Well he's on now. Sri Lanka need to step up the pace against Ajmal though, he's only gone for 20 off 12 and he's likely to bowl for most of the remainder of the day. They won't get over the line if he ends up bowling 30 overs for 60.
 

stumpski

International Captain
How long is it till tea by the way?


Just seen it, 5 minutes away. Just trying to work out how many more overs there might be.
 
Last edited:

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
it feels so weird - the pakistani tail fights, and the sl batsmen a) lose wickets and b) have gun batsmen settle for a draw.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Think Ajmal is one of those bowlers who's naturally better against RHers, paradoxically. Bowls a very tight off-stump line and plays against both edges (and the stumps!) against the RHer but the angle in with the left hander from around the wicket makes that sort of approach a little more difficult.
 

smash84

The Tiger King
Think Ajmal is one of those bowlers who's naturally better against RHers, paradoxically. Bowls a very tight off-stump line and plays against both edges (and the stumps!) against the RHer but the angle in with the left hander from around the wicket makes that sort of approach a little more difficult.
awta.....a more useful off spinner than Swanny I reckon who is good against the left handers
 

CWB304

U19 Cricketer
Think Ajmal is one of those bowlers who's naturally better against RHers, paradoxically. Bowls a very tight off-stump line and plays against both edges (and the stumps!) against the RHer but the angle in with the left hander from around the wicket makes that sort of approach a little more difficult.
Yes I can imagine Swann watching intently trying to learn some of Ajmal's trade secrets against RHers. But for all his skill, without the threat of turn the other way - by doosra or more conventionally -, he can not realistically hope to carry the same threat.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
I still think Swann can be much, much better against RHers than he is, where he has a tendency to bowl far too straight given the amount of turn he gets and hence gives up easy singles square on the legside.

They're just very different bowlers, and their style of bowling is very much suited both to their roles in their respective teams and, more importantly, the pitches they play on. I still have doubts about how Ajmal will go outside the subcontinent.
 
Last edited:

smash84

The Tiger King
I still think Swann can be much, much better against RHers than he is, where he has a tendency to bowl far too straight given the amount of turn he gets and hence gives up easy singles square on the legside.

They're just very different bowlers, and their style of bowling is very much suited both to their roles in their respective teams and, more importantly, the pitches they play on. I still have doubts about how Ajmal will go outside the subcontinent.
Ajmal will get screwed up in Aus again despite being a much better bowler than he was during our last tour.

Aus have a history of toying with our bowlers and with the 3rd rate fielding 400+ scores become a norm against our bowling
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Yeah, because he'll bowl too short and get picked off the back foot with ease when he bowls his natural length. When he tries to pitch it up to compensate, well...

Mind you, you don't tour here for aaaaages IIRC.
 

Top