vic_orthdox
Global Moderator
Pietersen...
I used to think so too, but realistically I don't think burdening a man battling with depression with the full-time captaincy of a side would have ended well.Tresco would have been a good captain.
Yep obviously the man for the job, him and Freddy to do it together.Pietersen...
The Chef.A couple of years on
1. Cook
2. Trescothick
3. Smith
4. Pietersen
5. Thorpe
6. Stewart
7. Flintoff
8. Swann
9. Broad
10. Anderson
11. Fraser
Broad just edging out Caddick and is assuming that he keeps his current form going.
Prior has probably done more than enough to edge out Stewart but still more comfortable with Alec at 6, still a shame he did not just stay an opener.
Despite his recent troubles I wanted Bell but not done enough to get in above Thorpe.
Trott maybe should be at 3 but I love the Judge too much.
Problem is there is no captain.
A couple of years on
1. Cook
2. Trescothick
3. Smith
4. Pietersen
5. Thorpe
6. Stewart
7. Flintoff
8. Swann
9. Broad
10. Anderson
11. Fraser
Problem is there is no captain.
I call bull****. 10 wins and 7 losses in their last 25 matches is a crap record. 3 series wins out of the last 9 as well (NZ, SL and WI the 3 wins so not beaten a top side in a long time).awta
South Africa is the most consistent side in world cricket today. The side most rounded to play in any condition.
I seem to remember the english holding on for dear life with Onions saving their bacon. How people easily people forget....I call bull****. 10 wins and 7 losses in their last 25 matches is a crap record. 3 series wins out of the last 9 as well (NZ, SL and WI the 3 wins so not beaten a top side in a long time).
Lol team is fine but Prince over Gibbs? Also i think Philander aint done enough to warrant selection.IMOSmith
Kirsten
Amla
Kallis
de Villiers
Prince
Boucher
Pollock
Philander
Steyn
Donald
The batting is weak, look at that bowling though!
I judged the team on how well they played when I watched them, not the players I watched with the best record. Philander has been awesome and has looked better to me than guys like Ntini ever did.Lol team is fine but Prince over Gibbs? Also i think Philander aint done enough to warrant selection.IMO
Yes, they did indeed save a game in that manner. I can remember that as well, but we're talking about a team that has only won 40% of recent games and not won a series against a major nation in ages - that is not worthy of the praise they seem to get.I seem to remember the english holding on for dear life with Onions saving their bacon. How people easily people forget....
Yeah you are probably right but he didn't do the job for long, if you think about an England side for the last 20 years then you really want one of Athers, Nasser, Vaughan or Strauss.Harsh on Stewart, to say the least.
No, but number 6 is a really weird position. Nowadays it's just used as a breeding spot for the younger talents before they get pushed up the order and another youngster gets moved in at 6. The only real exception to this in recent times is Mike Hussey.When I was thinking of my South Africa squad, I also couldn't think of a decent no 6, so I put Klusener in there who btw is one if my fab South African players. Has South Africa ever had a world class no 6?
Indeed - I was only commenting on the XI listed though.Yeah you are probably right but he didn't do the job for long, if you think about an England side for the last 20 years then you really want one of Athers, Nasser, Vaughan or Strauss.