I put some of the 84 touring side in as I mainly remember the bowling, Can't really recall Lloyd or he would have made the team. Logie was a sod against us, whenever you thought you had them on the ropes (not very often) he'd come in and score heavily and snuff it out. He was also a bloody good number 6 who could bat well with the lower order long before so much emphasis was put on it as it is these days.Mate I quite like that Windies side, but I'm wondering if someone like Lloyd, or if he's before your time Sarwan, would go ahead of Gus. Little bloke was a terrific fieldsman but his record is not that flash tstl.
Haha yes.that was Dujon for usI put some of the 84 touring side in as I mainly remember the bowling, Can't really recall Lloyd or he would have made the team. Logie was a sod against us, whenever you thought you had them on the ropes (not very often) he'd come in and score heavily and snuff it out. He was also a bloody good number 6 who could bat well with the lower order long before so much emphasis was put on it as it is these days.
Logie, career average 35.79, v England 46.40 and he never even got a ton the bugger.Haha yes.that was Dujon for us
Fair enough, can't blame you for that. I think my middle order for the Windies from those I've seen would be:Logie, career average 35.79, v England 46.40 and he never even got a ton the bugger.
If 1984 was the first WI series you saw, then I can't fault your logic at all. However, those of us who saw Lloyd in the mid-1970s would find him impossible to leave out. With Chanderpaul doing the Logie job in our best XI.I put some of the 84 touring side in as I mainly remember the bowling, Can't really recall Lloyd or he would have made the team. Logie was a sod against us, whenever you thought you had them on the ropes (not very often) he'd come in and score heavily and snuff it out. He was also a bloody good number 6 who could bat well with the lower order long before so much emphasis was put on it as it is these days.