How is that not a chuck? **** me gently.
I was wondering. We'll need to dismiss Pak for under 100 again though.2 day test anyone?
You think the comms are right? Players not covering with their pads for fear of DRS getting them lb; they miss it with their bats and are bowled. I think there's a fair bit to that in this series.Prior was so concerned about getting his front pad blown off he couldn't commit forward, trying to play with his bat but it's not his natural way, he'd rather have his pad out leading and then play the ball under his eyes through the offside. That one just held it's line a little bit more, probably pot luck but he bowled a really, really good line to Prior and deserved the wicket.
Could be an explosive encounter.Pakistan are playing Afghanistan in an ODI this month? itstl.
Were they saying that afterwards? Just turned off the tv straight after the wicket. There's definitely a lot about it, guys have been putting their pad down the off stump line for years, and getting away with it being "too far down" or "hitting outside the line". Now they are being shown up for it, and having to hit the ball hard and straight at the bowler rather than towards cover with an open face. To do that, you have to put your foot down the wicket, and it's creating all sorts of problems.You think the comms are right? Players not covering with their pads for fear of DRS getting them lb; they miss it with their bats and are bowled. I think there's a fair bit to that in this series.
srs? Hope it's aired.Pakistan are playing Afghanistan in an ODI this month? itstl.
Lol. I nearly said "competing for the Dean Jones Trophy" but thought better of it.Could be an explosive encounter.
Yes, I went there.
Dire.Could be an explosive encounter.
Yes, I went there.
See, your argument loses all credibility when you're advocating dropping KP and Bell yet retaining Morgan who barely averaged 40 against the same attacks you're deriding Pietersen and Bell for cashing in against.You're right, and I apologise. I feel so strongly about this subject, and am so desperate to shake the selectors and my fellow England fans out of their self-induced complacency as to the adequacy of our middle order batting, that I occasionally go too far.
You can take all future posts on this subject as if they had been prefaced by the following, (which will go unwritten, as it is a bit of a mouthful):
"In an ideal world, in which hackneyed assumptions about 'weight of runs' were set aside in favour of a realistic acceptance of consistent patterns of underperformance under certain conditions by some senior players over a number of years..."
KP and Bell would both be dropped for the next Test.
Eventually, the patterns I've identified will become conventional wisdom, and the people accusing me of being "as stupid as stupid gets", or of hating on Bell because he screwed my sister/girlfriend/pet, will all too predictably crawl out of the woodwork, and jump on one of the many bandwagons they spend their lives waiting for.
Yes it will be. On the 10th of Feb apparently.srs? Hope it's aired.
Yeah they were. Was a pretty interesting discussion. It makes sense, doesn't it? And of course the thing is, even though it's now part of the game, blokes won't be exposed to it til they get to international level, so it's questionable whether techniques will change. By the time you get there, most of your technique is settled.Were they saying that afterwards? Just turned off the tv straight after the wicket. There's definitely a lot about it, guys have been putting their pad down the off stump line for years, and getting away with it being "too far down" or "hitting outside the line". Now they are being shown up for it, and having to hit the ball hard and straight at the bowler rather than towards cover with an open face. To do that, you have to put your foot down the wicket, and it's creating all sorts of problems.
Damn, I'm enlisting on the 7thYes it will be. On the 10th of Feb apparently.
In what?Damn, I'm enlisting on the 7th