Pakistan have always been better travellers than India.at least we can say that we won one match away from home (2 matches in England in total)
No, I just think Finn might actually score more than Morgan and might contribute a few more good overs than him..Yes the key to fixing that issue is obviously to try and bowl the opposition out for 50 or so, which will obviously be easier to achieve if England's best bowlers bowl a smaller percentage of the overs.
Interesting definition of Finn there.. I just think it is a no brainer that whoever you have for your 6th batsmen slot is so bad that they can't even look like scoring a run in certain conditions, you might as well play an extra bowler.This sort of logic is why weaker sides always seem to wind up with countless 'all rounders' who contribute **** all.
Or you try a different batsman.Interesting definition of Finn there.. I just think it is a no brainer that whoever you have for your 6th batsmen slot is so bad that they can't even look like scoring a run in certain conditions, you might as well play an extra bowler.
Logic. Nowhere to be seen.No, I just think Finn might actually score more than Morgan and might contribute a few more good overs than him..
But why bother with facts when you can have your sly digs..
yeah, I can see why it would be hard for some.Logic. Nowhere to be seen.
If you think he is any better than this #6, sure. I just don't think so.Or you try a different batsman.
Or in other words what Scaly described was pretty close to what the conditions would be like. I did want 3 spinners touring, albeit one was Borthwick for the situation where England were trying to force a win and wanted to go in with 5 bowlers. Pakistan have never played that well against Panesar and I always thought he'd take wickets against them.No; Pothas's point was that Scaly really, really dislikes Panesar and used to whinge about him constantly when he was in the side as a regular.
The point is though, as I said before, the selectors obviously thought Morgan and Bopara were pretty good players originally or they wouldn't have picked them in the squad to begin with.If you think he is any better than this #6, sure. I just don't think so.
You know, I understand all that. I am just saying what I think will be most beneficial to this English side for the next match. Now of course, Ravi may well go on and play well and score a hundred. But as of today, I just don't think he or Morgan are test class batsmen for these conditions, and England would be better served with having Finn in their eleven instead of either of these two.The point is though, as I said before, the selectors obviously thought Morgan and Bopara were pretty good players originally or they wouldn't have picked them in the squad to begin with.
I don't rate either of them either and would've brought over Taylor and someone else (Bairstow perhaps) but the selectors obviously don't think they're really only about as likely to score runs as Finn or they wouldn't have picked them in the first place. Now you could argue that Morgan's performances on tour could have drastically changed their minds but Bopara hasn't done anything wrong since being selected to indicate to them they were wrong.
I put my balls on the line and voted for England after the first Test.Just noticed the couple of extra votes under Pakistan in the poll added after the 2nd test. Start owning up people
Highly doubt Davies will play ahead of Morgan anyway so you won't get your wish, IMO.Bell has stomach upset.
Insert your own "lack of intestinal fortitude" joke.
Seriously, might be a blessing in disguise. Could rest him as he's ill without the stigma of dropping him.
What about the subsequent tours to Sri Lanka & India?Bell has stomach upset.
Insert your own "lack of intestinal fortitude" joke.
Seriously, might be a blessing in disguise. Could rest him as he's ill without the stigma of dropping him.