Nah this pitch is flat, Steyn isn't at his peak, Morkel is in dire form and Tahir sucks.5000 runs up for Samaraweera and there's his 2nd ton of the tour. Played
Oh it's not the size that counts it's what you do with itI want you guys to play de Lange because I selfishly want to see what he bowls like, since I hear he has a ridiculously short run up.
I am trying to work out if this is a troll or a lolNah this pitch is flat, Steyn isn't at his peak, Morkel is in dire form and Tahir sucks.
Rubbish hundred.
He's being sarcastic.I am trying to work out if this is a troll or a lol
I am trying to work out if this is a troll or a lol
I hear that once he gets going it's all over very quickly.Oh it's not the size that counts it's what you do with it
I quite like the look of that. Very solid batting lineup.Yeah I like Thirimanne as well but I don't think he's a better batsman right now than Prasanna and Prasanna's definitely a better keeper than Chandimal. I also think, perhaps somehow controversially, that Mathews would be a better opener than he is a #6.
So I'd be looking at:
1 Mathews
2 Dilshan
3 Sangakkara
4 Jayawardene
5 Samaraweera
6 Chandimal
7 Jayawardene
Agree with the first bit. But in that case why is he better than De Lange who looked a similar pace but more accurate and some kind of X factor as well - who the hell gets 7 wickets from nowhereMorkel just bowls too short. Back of a length hasn't really cut it in tests ever since every batsman and his dog started playing the cut shot well. I think he's better than De Lange, though.
Because if you judged Morkel completely based on one random game that happened to be his best ever, he'd look ****ing good as well.Agree with the first bit. But in that case why is he better than De Lange who looked a similar pace but more accurate and some kind of X factor as well - who the hell gets 7 wickets from nowhere
Samaraweera, because he's so awesome.Who's frontrunner for MOTS?