Doubt it. We only sack people when they're bowlers.So if SA don't win the next test, he is out as captain?
So I take it you want him sacked?Doubt it. We only sack people when they're bowlers.
For years.So I take it you want him sacked?
Doubt it. We only sack people when they're bowlers.
And he was also rattling on with words to the effect that Steyn might be rested for the last test which will be a dead rubber.Kepler Wessels prior to the game saying South Africa A could beat Sri Lanka. Oh dear. Its guys like Kepler that breeds the overconfidence and faux superiority complex a lot of the South African cricketers have. Remarkably Kepler and co. were talking about how straight forward the tour to NZ would be, at the same moment South Africa were 6 down for nothing in the second innings and on their way to a 200 run defeat.
You wouldn't even come close to calling Paul Collingwood handy then?27 wickets at 50 is someway off what I'd be calling handy.
Handy is something like a Samit Patel.
If he were really better than the stats suggest then he would bowl more.He is better than the stats suggest, he just doesn't bowl anywhere near enough in the longer version.
His equivalent to 27 @ 50 is 115 @ 36, not really in the same ballpark, especially when you look at the economy rates.You wouldn't even come close to calling Paul Collingwood handy then?
I think it's fair to say that Elgar is a handy First Class bowler; but he's unlikely to be a handy Test bowler based on what he's done so far with the gap in quality. On your point about watching players bowl; I don't reckon anyone who nominated Elgar due to bowling has actually seen him bowl much tbh.But you're a participant of your environment, and Paul Collingwood played test cricket, so should be judged on that.
So by your rational, Paul Collingwood was nowhere near being a handy bowler because he had a bowling average of 60.
More to knowing what a handy bowler is than looking at cricinfo stats mate.
No my point about looking at cricinfo is that there's more to being a handy bowler than just looking at an average.I think it's fair to say that Elgar is a handy First Class bowler; but he's unlikely to be a handy Test bowler based on what he's done so far with the gap in quality. On your point about watching players bowl; I don't reckon anyone who nominated Elgar due to bowling has actually seen him bowl much tbh.
Lakmal isn't playing, and if I'd known that I'd have said Welegedara, so I claim my five bucks for this.I look forward to seeing Lakmal take 5/40 to trigger an absurd series-levelling collapse.