i agree; but waqar has done worse - including match fixing, possibly.Malcolm Marshall
Waqar Younis (Can't believe I'm not voting for Hadlee! But his recent comments on Tendulkar being better than Bradman, and Anderson being better than Steyn are such lol-worthy that I couldn't help!)
And still Shane Warne is your favorite bowler ?i agree; but waqar has done worse - including match fixing, possibly.
purely as bowlers both were mighty exciting to watch. and both happen to be dickheads when it comes to a few things. i had to resort to hadlee's superior batting ability to separate the two. (yeah, i know this is to determine the favorite not the better cricketer of the two; i liked hadlee's batting quite a bit. had to acknowledge that somewhere. this poll seems to be a good occasion to do so)
sharing weather/pitch info with bookies is not the same as fixing matches. of course, you can disagree with me.And still Shane Warne is your favorite bowler ?
Agreed. But Waqar has never been caught/proven to be involved in Match fixing? It is only a suspicion.sharing weather/pitch info with bookies is not the same as fixing matches. of course, you can disagree with me.
gilly gone FMLMarshall and Hadlee.
Read belowsharing weather/pitch info with bookies is not the same as fixing matches. of course, you can disagree with me.
ThisAgreed. But Waqar has never been caught/proven to be involved in Match fixing? It is only a suspicion.
And in the balance of probabilities Warne has been proven to have links with Bookies and even taken money from them, while i do not think Waqar has been. Have to agree to disagree, i guess.
justice quayyam made it clear that some senior players, including waqar, were involved in fixing matches. just that he was a fan of those accused cricketers and so he didnt want to pull the curtain on their careers; typical subcontinental justice. dont want to take the discussion away from the thread topic. i gave my reasons as to why i did not vote for waqar here, and wasim earlier; you can choose to agree with me or not. but as far as i am concerned my logic is consistent in rejecting them and choosing warne.Agreed. But Waqar has never been caught/proven to be involved in Match fixing? It is only a suspicion.
And in the balance of probabilities Warne has been proven to have links with Bookies and even taken money from them, while i do not think Waqar has been. Have to agree to disagree, i guess.
justice quayyam made it clear that some senior players, including waqar, were involved in fixing matches. just that he was a fan of those accused cricketers and so he didnt want to pull the curtain on their careers; typical subcontinental justice. dont want to take the discussion away from the thread topic. i gave my reasons as to why i did not vote for waqar here, and wasim earlier; you can choose to agree with me or not. but as far as i am concerned my logic is consistent in rejecting them and choosing warne.