flibbertyjibber
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Better than Mats Wilander anyway.Would you consider Bresnan as being top quality?
Better than Mats Wilander anyway.Would you consider Bresnan as being top quality?
That was the attack for the first Test against India, was it not? Really not that long ago.I would have Anderson, Broad and Tremlett as top quality. I don't think Bresnan is at the same quality level as the other three.
While on paper he is our 5th bowler, he is easily our 2nd best bowler and pushing Harris for top spot.Still reckon Australia are a good chance. You bowled these ****s out for 96 with your fifth bowler.
For me it's more how they operate as a unit. While Bresnan might not look top quality he gets the job done as his record shows. Combine that with Anderson and Broad and you have yourself a quality trio.I would have Anderson, Broad and Tremlett as top quality. I don't think Bresnan is at the same quality level as the other three.
Well since Tsotsobe got dropped...A controversial question, but would you consider Asif, Amir and Gul as top quality?
What about Steyn, Morkel and Tsotsobe?
Asif, Amir and Gul was top quality as a unit, but if you're talking about a team having three top quality quicks as you were before then Gul makes the answer no; he's fractionally above average to good.A controversial question, but would you consider Asif, Amir and Gul as top quality?
What about Steyn, Morkel and Tsotsobe?
Why is Lyon in the team?
Being the best spinner in the squad is irrelevant when they are all ****!
Plus he cant bat and is a very average fieldsman
I think Bresnan is a very under rated bowler itbt.For me it's more how they operate as a unit. While Bresnan might not look top quality he gets the job done as his record shows. Combine that with Anderson and Broad and you have yourself a quality trio.
Yeah you should be hoping Dougeh develops into a Bresnan. Although I'm pretty sure we've had that conversation before.I think Bresnan is a very under rated bowler itbt.
Movement + pace + excellent accuracy = legend.
A quick who bowls close to 90mph, takes wickets cheaply and reasonably quickly, is accurate, gives very little away, hits the bat hard, has great stamina and can reverse it is a top drawer quick. The only reasons people don't seem to rate Bresnan are because of a) how he looks and b) because he spent the 2 years prior to his run in the Test side being a thoroughly average ODI bowler.For me it's more how they operate as a unit. While Bresnan might not look top quality he gets the job done as his record shows. Combine that with Anderson and Broad and you have yourself a quality trio.
Yeah we have. I said Dougeh reminds me heaps of Bresnan and you said "Yeah, they even got picked way before they were ready based on what they looked like they could be."Yeah you should be hoping Dougeh develops into a Bresnan. Although I'm pretty sure we've had that conversation before.
Agree he has all the right ingredients just needs to keep doing it to convince more people. In a way he's like Watson, you wouldn't see him as a frontline bowler but he always gets the job done and just happens to be the only bowler for us that consistently swings and reverse swings it.I think Bresnan is a very under rated bowler itbt.
Movement + pace + excellent accuracy = legend.
Anderson ffs.I think Bresnan will be the pick of the bowlers in the UAE.
I actually love Bresnan. As much strike power as an bowler going but has more stamina than most.A quick who bowls close to 90mph, takes wickets cheaply and reasonably quickly, is accurate, gives very little away, hits the bat hard, has great stamina and can reverse it is a top drawer quick. The only reasons people don't seem to rate Bresnan are because of a) how he looks and b) because he spent the 2 years prior to his run in the Test side being a thoroughly average ODI bowler.
I've always liked him even before his Test debut. One of those guys that gets the job done. Throw him into our side and he'll be 2nd best or even equal with Harris.A quick who bowls close to 90mph, takes wickets cheaply and reasonably quickly, is accurate, gives very little away, hits the bat hard, has great stamina and can reverse it is a top drawer quick. The only reasons people don't seem to rate Bresnan are because of a) how he looks and b) because he spent the 2 years prior to his run in the Test side being a thoroughly average ODI bowler.
Watson's a funny one, because against England he bowls exactly how you'd expect a 5th bowler to bowl - jogs in and trundles down some 80mph stuff that's reasonably accurate but pretty non-threatening. If the only time you saw him bowl was in the Ashes you wouldn't rate him any higher than Paul Collingwood with the ball.Agree he has all the right ingredients just needs to keep doing it to convince more people. In a way he's like Watson, you wouldn't see him as a frontline bowler but he always gets the job done and just happens to be the only bowler for us that consistently swings and reverse swings it.