It's great, I'd go third though. Basin, by a country mile, Seddon Park, then University Oval. All three have the ability to walk right around the field of play and have great vantage points.University Oval is awes and will only get better. 2nd best Test venue in the country for mine.
Would rather top the FC standings. Followed by List A.Hard to tell whether he was talking about first class cricket in general or Auckland's season. Clearly with titles in both shorter forms of the game and the complete opposite in our Plunket Shield results, it's an area he saw as being disappointing. This sentiment was felt by the whole team though and is a definite area for improvement.
To my recollection no MA has ever won all three titles. What's your opinion? Pick your strengths and target specific format titles or play to perform the best in all three formats?
Whilst yours is a noble view, and I'm inclined to go the same way as a purist as well...you've got to accept this isn't the case for cricketers.Would rather top the FC standings. Followed by List A.
I know he was never the greatest bowler but i always wondered what his career would have been like if he was given a few more opportunities in the test arena. His performances over there in county cricket have been immense.No domestic preseason is complete without an Andre Adams rant.
Very worrying he thinks we're that far behind England, though not surprising in the slightest.
Yup. Demolished an old building to do so which caused a kerfuffle last year...Haven't they just recently extended the boundaries to the University Oval?
The reason why it isn't second itbt.Seddon Park is great too, despite the city in which it lies.
There is nothing wrong with Hamilton /too tired for a rant defending my home town.Seddon Park is great too, despite the city in which it lies.
I went out there for a night on the town in 1999 thought it was ok. I havn't even tried Wellington (I am old) and Upper Hutt certainly has nothing.The Tron pre-10pm is great. It's like a very mini Melbourne sporting-wise with Seddon Park/Waikato Stadium and the V8s within a stone's throw. All great venues. Plus they have great golf courses.
But the nightlife is.the.pits. Awful. Unbearable.
And I'm down there at the rugby tomorrow. Yeow!
Thanks, I've searched a bit so I also discovered that and was quite surprised; it looks like they are not even making the highlights of the games.no FC games are televised in NZ.
You must've had that America's Cup conversation in a yacht club. 1 in a million NZers gives a monkey's about rich men and their boats. Maybe not even that much.Гурин;2667931 said:Thanks, I've searched a bit so I also discovered that and was quite surprised; it looks like they are not even making the highlights of the games.
How much would it cost to put 1 or 2 still cameras behind the wicket in 2011? That's inexplicable behavior from NZC
However, that would explain how come every NZer i've met said that he played it "in school" but wasn't really into cricket, "but there's surely somebody who is", yet they were more willing to talk even America's Cup, and, if they do knew something about cricket, they tried to change subject as soon as possible; it looked like following cricket was some sort of a shame (something that's common to the English, I have to say)
Well, I don't know about you, but while during 99% of their lives no italian gives a hoot about sailing, as soon as some italian boat reaches the final they start such a massive advertising campaign that in a week time even the last farmer in the mountains pretends to be an expert in winds and spinnakers.You must've had that America's Cup conversation in a yacht club. 1 in a million NZers gives a monkey's about rich men and their boats. Maybe not even that much.
Well, so where's the harm in streaming the games for free (even without commentary) on the NZC website? You just need a couple of slightly evoluted webcams in every ground, and the score to appear in the bottom! How much could it cost?NZ Cricket's domestic cricket scoring has the highest hit rate of any sporting website in the country. There's definitely interest, and a lot of it.
As for cameras behind the arm...yeah it'd be nice. Not sure what it amounts to budget-wise, television companies are not up to their ears in cameras (I'd guess) and there are bigger priorities than domestic cricket. Or maybe they know they can't cover it all the time - given internationals and whatever else may be on - so they don't want to do any coverage that isn't a blanket one.
We went gaga over the America's Cup a few years ago..but until it returns here, it's hardly a blip. Trust me, cricket is huge here.Гурин;2668079 said:Well, I don't know about you, but while during 99% of their lives no italian gives a hoot about sailing, as soon as some italian boat reaches the final they start such a massive advertising campaign that in a week time even the last farmer in the mountains pretends to be an expert in winds and spinnakers.
Well, so where's the harm in streaming the games for free (even without commentary) on the NZC website? You just need a couple of slightly evoluted webcams in every ground, and the score to appear in the bottom! How much could it cost?
I think it might even bring some new sponsorship, if what you say about the hit rate on the scoring pages is true I'm 100% sure that quite a few people would get a look at the games.