I went to The Oval last night for the Surrey vs Hants game. Interesting contrast in approaches, if nothing else. For Hants, we saw the keeper standing up to both opening bowlers (Cork & Mascarenas) before unleashing their two leggies plus the slow left-armer Briggs. Surrey never quite got going as they would have liked, but didn't get completely bogged down against the leg-spin, didn't lose many wickets and ended up with a score that whilst below par was at least defendable if they took early wickets.
Surrey, otoh, played four quicks, with Davies spending most of the innings half-way back to the boundary. The good news for England is that apparently we have four better bowlers than Tremlett available for the one-day side. They really must be quite something, because Tremlett was unplayable in his opening spell yesterday. The most remarkable thing about Hampshire being 9 for 4 was that it should have been even worse. McKenzie was badly dropped on zero before departing soon afterwards. All of the batsmen played and missed regularly. And, potentially crucially, Afridi was dropped very early in his innings. It's no exaggeration to say that they could have been 6 for 5.
Afridi then got going nicely and the game was looking interesting. Another 8 overs or so and Surrey would have been very worried indeed, but the young SLA Ansari had him caught at deep cover, and that was that. RHB even felt it was safe to give Gareth Batty a bowl near the end of the innings. Beyond that, the most interesting moment in the last half dozen overs was Meaker beamer that would have been dangerous if it was about two meters lower.
But Surrey are looking better than they have done in years. I don't think their batting goes deep enough to win games when they don't get a good start, but they at least look like a side that knows where they're going again.