• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* India in South Africa

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Twitter is fantastic. Follow a lot of columnists and journalists who link to great and interesting articles, cricket and in general society, politics and culture. It's impossible to read all the awesome stuff on the internet. Twitter just gives you a helping hand.

Sure there's crap on it, but there's crap on CW as well.
31975 posts of it and counting in fact :ph34r:
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Completely agree with the South Africa dude on the Ten Cricket analyst panel (always forget his name). India were in more winning positions in this Cape Town test, and probably shaded the series slightly.
Craig Matthews.. Would never forget that ultra economic bowling of his in the Sharjah Cup sometime in the mid 90s.. Dude opens the bowling with Pollock/De Villers and the score was like 23/1 off 10 EVERY MATCH..
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
I've had this debate over about 40 pages in another thread so I'm not going to do it again properly here, but I don't think judging an England attack which didn't feature Chris Tremlett, and featured Anderson and Broad before they'd improved to the standard they bowl now, is in any way a good reflection of anything.

England have proved little; I've said that before. Quoting past results means nothing to me because my predictions about England are not based on the past results of the team as a whole, but what I think their attack is capable of and likely to do in its current state, now that key members have improved and they've eliminated weaknesses in their team. If they'd decimated Australia 5-0 but carried Steve Finn or Monty Panesar, I wouldn't be saying what I am.

South Africa not winning that series was actually a perfect example of what I was saying in that first paragraph of the post you quoted btw.
PEWS, the point really is.. when it is over a sample size of few (very few, in fact) tests, have we really seen enough to call it improvement and are we really sure it is not their "peaks" which they won't be able to achieve again?


I made very similar calls reg. England and its bowling attack post 2005 Ashes and look at what happened later.. It is one thing to say they will do well coz currently they "seem" to be doing well. But who knows if it is the real thing? All we can do is wait and watch instead of making big claims like Gough did and gvenkat and some other English posters did in the other thread...


And for a man who comes across as caring more about "how much" than "how", you sure are setting a lot of store on "how" these bowlers looked in Australia.. :p
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
This is a really good point. The fact many of us are disappointed (to varying degrees) in only drawing the series shows how far this team has come.

The only away from the subcontinent series in recent times in which I was similarly disappointed was Australia 03-04.
AWTA completely. :)
 

Prad100w

U19 Cricketer
I wonder how the pitches would be like for the one-day series. Will it be the same as the test ones with a bit of bounce and some grass or will it be flatter? Haven't really seen a one-day match in SA lately so can hardly remember the type of wickets used in the previous few series.
 

Black_Warrior

Cricketer Of The Year
Can someone please tell me if Jacques Kallis fielded during India's first innings batting? and if he was off the field, for how long? Thanks
 

Top