-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
*Official* India in South Africa
- Thread starter James
- Start date
Cevno
Hall of Fame Member
silentstriker
The Wheel is Forever
Yea, that was high. Very unlucky.
This is disappointing. ICC get on the ball and make it part of the rules that UDRS must be used even if all the technology (e.g hotspot) is not available at every ground. Hawk-Eye seems to be available at most games, and that's certainly better than nothing.
This is disappointing. ICC get on the ball and make it part of the rules that UDRS must be used even if all the technology (e.g hotspot) is not available at every ground. Hawk-Eye seems to be available at most games, and that's certainly better than nothing.
silentstriker
The Wheel is Forever
Yes it was. Well over according to hawk-eye. UDRS would have reversed it.
Cevno
Hall of Fame Member
Do the reviews completely rely on where the hawk eye shows the ball going though?
Uppercut
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Wasn't even close to hitting the stumps tbh.
In fairness to the umpire it wasn't necessarily obvious real time. Pitched very full but still hit the batsman on the front foot high on the pad so the angle of the bounce was clearly taking it over, but tough one to get right.
silentstriker
The Wheel is Forever
Yes.
They check for no balls. Then they check where it pitched. Then they check if he hit it. And then they check if it would have hit the stumps.
R_D
International Debutant
Yeah would have definitely been reversed if UDRS were available.
Shri
Mr. Glass
lolwut? Kumble or any leg spinner for that matter is better than offies when there is bounce on offer.
silentstriker
The Wheel is Forever
Kumble didn't really have much turn. The reason he got 600 wickets is because of his bounce. His deliveries pretty much exploded off the pitch if there was uneven bounce.
Cevno
Hall of Fame Member
They check the where the ball is going, but don't neccesarily give decisions based on it though.
It may be clearer in this case.
But in many cases the bowl has been shown to be hitting or missing the stumps and according to that the incorrect decision has stood.
There are cases as well where hawkeye has shown some ridiculous tracks of deliveries when all logic says it would have done something else.
