• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* India in South Africa

M0rphin3

International Debutant
Boucher gone. What really bothers me is the way SA batted, no way in hell they'd have had a chance with such conservative tactics. Dire stuff.
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Shocking stuff. It's typical that it goes India's way. Hopefully South Africa will act like Indians regarding this, but they probably won't.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
This is a bit of a joke. I'm going to struggle to even congratulate India on it, which is harsh on them too because they were favourites even beforehand and have bowled quite well. It's like they've been robbed of the opportunity to win the match fairly.
 

LJMJ

U19 12th Man
What's disappointing is India doesn't need these decisions. They're bowling so well that it's hard to imagine them not getting these guys soon anyway.
 

Stapel

International Regular
Pfffff, crap umpiring and Indian stubberness & stupidity robbing me of a great day of cricket!

I hate this!
 

Cevno

Hall of Fame Member
Man, that's good. Vague suspicion of height again, but to bring it back into the right-hander like that is top, top swing bowling.

EDIT: Hawkeye's clearly wrong there, plotted the ball going on gunbarrel straight, but Zak had brought it back into Boucher. Hmm.
True.

No way it was going gun barrel straight.

Hawkeye is wrong many times in terms of swing and spin.
 

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I see the cricinfo commentary is pretty scathing on the umpires...

39.6


Harbhajan Singh to de Villiers, OUT, 86.0 kph, Harbhajan has struck the second big blow of the morning and AB de Villiers has been adjudged lbw. Controversial as they come. Harbhajan tossed this up on off and middle and got it to bite and straighten. AB was forward, but struck around the knee in front of the stumps. Replays suggests that was going over the stumps. The way AB played at that made him look plumber than he should have been - he reached forward instead of front and across and played inside the line. It struck in front of middle. AB is not pleased at all. India are on top here.


AB de Villiers lbw b Harbhajan Singh 33 (103m 76b 0x4 1x6) SR: 43.42



42.4


Khan to Boucher, OUT, oh my, that's a poor decision from Davis. Things are not going SA's way this morning. Zaheer lands one back of a length on middle and though that straightened a fraction, it was still going to miss off stump. Easily. Boucher was in the crease as he tried to angle it square and it thudded into his pad a smidgen outside off stump. And it was heading further away from the line of the furniture. Umpire Davis did not think so. India's insistence to not have the UDRS might have earned them a wicket here.


MV Boucher lbw b Khan 1 (12m 6b 0x4 0x6) SR: 16.66


It's pure insanity they don't use the UDRS in every test match, laughing stock tbh.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
One or two more bad decision and this is Sydney-esque. India should never have lost that series or at least that match, but if SA get one or two more bad ones, I'll treat this the same way.

That didn't excuse India for collapsing to Clarke then, and it doesn't take credit from the Indian bowling here, but unfair is unfair.
 

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
Pfffff, crap umpiring and Indian stubberness & stupidity robbing me of a great day of cricket!

I hate this!
You could call it BCCI's stubbornness and stupidity. That'd be better. Indians, like myself, actually hate these bad decisions.
 

Cevno

Hall of Fame Member
Ummm, no.

That makes no sense at all.

The incorrect decision standing? Hell no. If there is doubt then it goes back to the umpire. If there is clear evidence of the ball going well over the top, then of course it is going to be reversed. How hard is it to understand?
Can't find a example at the moment.

But in a case the batsmen is given not out but the hawkeye says it is hitting the stumps ,then there have been cases where after calling it marginal the original decision has stood ,due to uncertainty.
 

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
South Africa would have thought they'd used up all their bad luck with the Kallis dismissal in the first innings
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Can't find a example at the moment.

But in a case the batsmen is given not out but the hawkeye says it is hitting the stumps ,then there have been cases where after calling it marginal the original decision has stood ,due to uncertainty.
Yeah but that doesn't apply when it's missing the stumps. If it's missing the stumps it's not out and that's that.
 

Top