Nah.india are well in control.
pitch is taking spin, bhaji is looking good, conditions will be helpful for the bowlers.
india have plenty of runs.
seriously, whats the fear, mockers??
Actually Sehwag's two knocks up top in this test,albeit small ones were crucial in this test on tough conditions.There's an easier solution that you're all missing though- Sehwag doesn't like opening, so bat him at three, open with Vijay and Gambhir and leave everyone else be.
Having Sehwag up top to "set the tone" is just a crappy idea in South Africa but if you want to do that once this tour's over it's perfectly reasonable to give one of the other two the number 3 spot.
How is getting Murali Vijay up top ,better than say playing Pujara at 3 and getting Kohli / Rahane at 6?1) Murali Vijay
2) Gautham Gambhir
3) VVS Laxman
4) Sachin Tendulkar
5) Virender Sehwag
6) Cheteshwar Pujara
7) MS Dhoni
Might work.
So you want to Shift Sehwag into the middle order and open with Rahane who is a number 3 batsmen?If we shift Sehwag down, then surely should look to try to get Rahane (FC average currently at 69.01) in as opener.
Actually the conditions in terms of the winds and the sun became better.Nah the pitch is the same as it's been all match.. decent assistance for bowlers. Of course De Villiers is a big threat, every one is a threat right now.
It is just an idea, dude.How is getting Murali Vijay up top ,better than say playing Pujara at 3 and getting Kohli / Rahane at 6?
And you want to shift most arguably the best opener in world cricket to 5?
Nah.
I don't actually agree.. I think they set the wrong tone. Sometimes negative cricket actually is the best option and this was one of those times.Actually Sehwag's two knocks up top in this test,albeit small ones were crucial in this test on tough conditions.
Gave India momentum up front and saved pressure from getting to Dravid and also a potential collapse.
But nevertheless, these are all fair arguments. I'm pretty indifferent as to whether you play Gambhir or Vijay at three instead but my point was that deciding to let Dravid go needn't involve the disruption of bringing in new players out of the blue to bat in a key position, overly screwing around with the batting order or batting someone in a position where they're not that comfortable. It's actually pretty easily solved.He does not like opening ,but he has been bloody succesfull there turning so many non winning and losing situations for India into winning ones.
Why the f would you want to tamper with that?
He is probably the best opener in world cricket for some time now.
Tendulkar could step up and bat three.I don't actually agree.. I think they set the wrong tone. Sometimes negative cricket actually is the best option and this was one of those times.
But nevertheless, these are all fair arguments. I'm pretty indifferent as to whether you play Gambhir or Vijay at three instead but my point was that deciding to let Dravid go needn't involve the disruption of bringing in new players out of the blue to bat in a key position, overly screwing around with the batting order or batting someone in a position where they're not that comfortable. It's actually pretty easily solved.
Wow that's an impressive piece of self-control. And it was a terrific day of test cricket so it will be worth it though at the end you won't be any closer to knowing who will win the test.I missed all of yesterday's play because of my parents' 25th anniversary.
Taped every ball and don't know the scores... have just started watching.
See you all in 8 hours!