I don't really agree, Morkel was an average bowler when that was what he relied on. When he runs through teams it's because he hits the right spots and moves the ball at pace, and one of the things that really endeared me to him was his working-out and working-over of Andrew Strauss this time last year. You can't fail to appreciate the line he bowls to left-handers from around the wicket. He's pretty much the perfect opening partner for Dale Steyn too, because he tends to excel against lefties and front-foot specialists, so watching those two together is just dreamy.Haha well a lot of the bowlers I do like tend to pitch it up but it's not a hard and fast rule. I like watching Stuart Clark and Chris Tremlett bowl and they bowl back of a length - they're still genuinely skillful though in a pure cricketing sense; they don't just rely on being fast, awkward and banging it in - they move it around (deliberately), have repeatable actions, are very accurate etc. Morkel's success is drawn disproportionately from his natural attributes and athleticism, which are big parts of cricket, but parts of cricket I don't enjoy watching as much as other parts.
He's obviously worked on the other parts of his game (or he really would be Dilhara) but they're still not in the same league as someone like, for example, Praveen Kumar, who can't even get a game at Test level in what's a pretty cack bowling attack. He doesn't rely purely on athleticism and natural attributes anymore but they are still the two most important things about his bowling.I don't really agree, Morkel was an average bowler when that was what he relied on. When he runs through teams it's because he hits the right spots and moves the ball at pace, and one of the things that really endeared me to him was his working-out and working-over of Andrew Strauss this time last year. You can't fail to appreciate the line he bowls to left-handers from around the wicket. He's pretty much the perfect opening partner for Dale Steyn too, because he tends to excel against lefties and front-foot specialists, so watching those two together is just dreamy.
We now have Sreesanth bowling to Kallis. I'm happy.
My name is Ojha. I bowl randomly wide of the crease to make it look like I know what I'm doing and that I have variety in my repotoire. But I don't... because I'm ****. Oh, and I am also out of the test team.My name is Sreesanth. I bowl randomly wide of the crease to make it look like I know what I'm doing and that I have variety in my repotoire. But I don't... because I'm ****.
Hit a fair few maximums against the Pak spinners in the recent test series in the Gulf. Usually early on as well. Closing in on the top 5 six hitters in test history. Still has hit more test sixes than Punter or Sachin.Kallis does not look settled at all. He does not try to hook the ball that early in his inning. Whats going on?
I love how you think bagging Ojha has an effect on me, when it doesn't at all.My name is Ojha. I bowl randomly wide of the crease to make it look like I know what I'm doing and that I have variety in my repotoire. But I don't... because I'm ****. Oh, and I am also out of the test team.
7 more and he will be 2nd to GilchristHit a fair few maximums against the Pak spinners in the recent test series in the Gulf. Usually early on as well. Closing in on the top 5 six hitters in test history. Still has hit more test sixes than Punter or Sachin.
umadbr0?I love how you think bagging Ojha has an effect on me, when it doesn't at all.
Just believe that his performances don't warrant being dropped when we play two spinners. Particularly since he outbowled Mishra when they went head to head in this match
18.7 more and he will be 2nd to gilchrist
19 more and he will be no.1
pretty unusual, but awesome!