• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* India in South Africa

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
It's not the batsmen who need to prove themselves- it's the bowlers. They've had something well in their favour here, and need to roll the batting side over cheaply to prove themselves. Unless the pitch is drastically flatter, the quartet of Ishant, Sreesanth, Harbhajan and Unadkat have to bowl the Proteas out for under 250 to show what they're worth in this side. Likewise, Raina should bowl far more than he usually has, to make up for batting failures. The batsmen, at the very least, have proven themselves elsewhere, bar such bowler-friendly conditions, but we've yet to see India's (seam) bowlers exploit the same conditions to roll teams over cheaply.

That's still no excuse for either of Unadkat or Yadav to be anywhere near Test selection, though.
 

Shri

Mr. Glass
Harbhajan says the pitch is damp. Will the ball turn a lot then? Whats the difference between a damp wicket and a sticky wicket anyway? Serious question. No smart ass puns please.:p
 

TT Boy

Hall of Fame Member
Need to get the final wicket first and then negotiate what is still likely to be a lively surface. 400 is still a pipe dream at this moment in time. This isn't Nagpur or Ahmedabad.
 

TT Boy

Hall of Fame Member
More than. They even declared at 400 odd after bowling England out for a similar score last year in the final Test of that series.
Which was played at a completely different ground + deck. That surface was just lightening quick and had plenty of bounce; this one is green and not particularly quick.
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Which was played at a completely different ground + deck. That surface was just lightening quick and had plenty of bounce; this one is green and not particularly quick.
The interesting thing about this pitch and in general in South Africa, is that there seems to be plenty of lateral movement on offer irrespective of overhead conditions... looked fairly sunny yesterday on TV. So the bowlers should be in the game throughout the innings really.
 

smash84

The Tiger King
The interesting thing about this pitch and in general in South Africa, is that there seems to be plenty of lateral movement on offer irrespective of overhead conditions... looked fairly sunny yesterday on TV. So the bowlers should be in the game throughout the innings really.
can't wait for the day's play to start.
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
IIRC, we didn't have any warm up games in NZ either...
As the article says, their bowling attack is not on the same planet as SA's (Martin's miracle spell in Ahmedabad aside) and India were lucky enough to bowl first when the conditions were helpful in the first Test.`
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Our pace bowlers are barely getting the ball to carry through properly to the keeper. :dry:
 

TT Boy

Hall of Fame Member
Probably not the best idea to bounce Smith when you have no pace, you are built like a child and the wicket isn’t very quick. Morne on average is 20kph+ quicker than Unadkat. Kallis quicker than the Indian seamers as well. Bhaji before lunch?
 

Top