• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* West Indies in Sri Lanka 2010

WindieWeathers

International Regular
:laugh::laugh::laugh:

First you accuse me of bias and next you dont care what I say. Are we back in 5th grade?

I like you. You remind me of when I was young and stupid. :p

Not sure if an office with 1500 people can be considered "little", but sure, call it whatever you like. There are definitely larger offices around.
I'd suggest you're still "stupid" at your current age because now you're trying to distort what i've said!! :laugh: , i accused the UMPIRES of being biased!.. NOT YOU, i only said i'm not surprised you agreed with them because your an SL fan, so please read my posts properly next time!!.
 
Last edited:

WindieWeathers

International Regular
WW taking a dub desicion looking at the TV picture to decide when it was darker. this is hilarious. WW do you know that video camera has a knob to adjust the brightness, contrast and lightness? How can you be so sure that the adjustments of the camera was exactly the same?

Himanavv who was just away from the groud has a better judgement on light than you who see it on the TV. And umpires used the light meters to decide when to go off. Stop whinging. Bravo lost the wicket due to a **** shot, not because of light. Over earlier he hammered a six off Herath, and did see it very well. Get over it that your boys played **** shots and got their backs against walls.
Oh my goodness i've never seen such a frivolous excuse!!..so now it's the "tv peoples fault" for making the screen darker? :lol: even if i'd accept such a feeble argument how the hell do you explain the umpires lingering around our batsmen for at least three overs with the light meters? 8-) IT WAS CLEARLY DARK!!, denying that is simply childish,

My opinions remains exactly the same, the umpires gave your lot a chance to get off when you were in trouble and they made us bat in the dark so your lot could take some wickets!!.. that's my view and it's not changing!!, furthermore we did have our "backs against the wall" and what good did it do your team? the game is heading for a draw!! :laugh: .
 

Himannv

Hall of Fame Member
I'd suggest you're still "stupid" at your current age because now you're trying to distort what i've said!! :laugh: , i accused the UMPIRES of being biased!.. NOT YOU, i only said i'm not surprised you agreed with them because your an SL fan, so please read my posts properly next time!!.
I don't think I even need to say anything lol. You contradict yourself in your own posts. Your statement indicates a bias on my part and you know it.

No need to hit me with the CAPS LOCK texts, the lame ass smileys (you must love the roll eyes one dont you kiddo) and the "quotes". I've had enough of your smartass little conspiracy theory. Sell it all you want, see if I care. Maybe Cricinfo will give you 50 bucks for it.... not.
 

Blaze 18

Banned
I wasn't watching the game WW...but maybe the commentators made a mistake and said that by accident. Players are not supposed to be offered the light anymore is my understanding.
There seems to be a lot of confusion regarding that rule. Even in one of the New Zealand-India tests, it seemed to me that the batsmen were offered the light - that is what the commentators thought too.
 

keith7786

Cricket Spectator
Saewan Dropped

It is a very sad thing that the great Sarwan has been dropped. West Indies will miss Brian Lara and Paul this time. GREAT BOWLING ATTACK!
 

WindieWeathers

International Regular
I don't think I even need to say anything lol. You contradict yourself in your own posts. Your statement indicates a bias on my part and you know it.

No need to hit me with the CAPS LOCK texts, the lame ass smileys (you must love the roll eyes one dont you kiddo) and the "quotes". I've had enough of your smartass little conspiracy theory. Sell it all you want, see if I care. Maybe Cricinfo will give you 50 bucks for it.... not.
Did i directly say "your biased"?!! NOPE!!..my comment basically suggested you were happy with their decision because your an SL fan!!, what the hell is wrong with that? 8-) furthermore i'll use CAPS and smileys as much as a damn well want thanks!!.. ain't no silly ponce gonna tell me how to post!! :laugh: , we simply disagree, no need to shed tears over it, you're more than welcome to move on now.
 

WindieWeathers

International Regular
There seems to be a lot of confusion regarding that rule. Even in one of the New Zealand-India tests, it seemed to me that the batsmen were offered the light - that is what the commentators thought too.
Thats very interesting!!.. and i'm 100% sure they did the same in our game the other day :unsure: .
 

Migara

International Coach
Oh my goodness i've never seen such a frivolous excuse!!..so now it's the "tv peoples fault" for making the screen darker? :lol: even if i'd accept such a feeble argument how the hell do you explain the umpires lingering around our batsmen for at least three overs with the light meters? 8-) IT WAS CLEARLY DARK!!, denying that is simply childish,
Don't be moronic. You see pictures of adjusted brightness. you were ****ing 10,000 miles away from where action occured and have no way of knowing other than what you see the enhanced images on the TV screen. Don't whine, Bravo played a **** shot. And how do you know that the light reading were different? WW, you are HALLUCINATING because of your patritic high horse. Get down from it, umpires have set limits to call for the light. Stop whining.

My opinions remains exactly the same, the umpires gave your lot a chance to get off when you were in trouble and they made us bat in the dark so your lot could take some wickets!!.. that's my view and it's not changing!!, furthermore we did have our "backs against the wall" and what good did it do your team? the game is heading for a draw!! :laugh: .
Your opinion has delusional perception:laugh:
 

WindieWeathers

International Regular
Don't be moronic. You see pictures of adjusted brightness. you were ****ing 10,000 miles away from where action occured and have no way of knowing other than what you see the enhanced images on the TV screen. Don't whine, Bravo played a **** shot. And how do you know that the light reading were different? WW, you are HALLUCINATING because of your patritic high horse. Get down from it, umpires have set limits to call for the light. Stop whining.

Your opinion has delusional perception:laugh:
Me "moronic"? 8-) your excuse is just about DELUSIONAL and you think i'm the "moron"? :laugh: and like i've said a million times already this has NOTHING to do with Darren Bravo!!.. but i guess as your argument is clearly futile you have to make up nonsense.
 
Last edited:

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Well, all comes down to the 3rd test at Pallekele & I see the long-term forecast is for storms:ph34r:
 

Top