To be fair, Mahmudullah was exactly what was needed when he came out - another wicket there and Bangladesh were in serious trouble but he stuck in with Shakib. Ideally though he'd have done that batting four so the team wouldn't have been under so much pressure, obviously...Agreed! And there goes Mahmudullah now to Hamish Bennett! Even Naeem Islam could have done MUCH better in this situation *MEH*!
Well that wasn't too clever.Shafiul's an excellent hitter. This is your time to shine son.
He's the next best thing. Best new bowler of 2010 IMO. He's gonna do great things.Have to admit I was wrong about Bennett. Top debut, and have to give credit to the selectors for picking him.
If he can some consistency with that yorker, he could become a class death bowler. Who'd have thought?
Well, he has a few years of **** behind him and 2 wickets were tailenders. I think he's quite a good prospect for tests but I'm not sold on ODIs yet. We weren't wrong to be skeptical.Have to admit I was wrong about Bennett. Top debut, and have to give credit to the selectors for picking him.
If he can some consistency with that yorker, he could become a class death bowler. Who'd have thought?
Mahmudullah is not a tailender.Well, he has a few years of **** behind him and 2 wickets were tailenders. I think he's quite a good prospect for tests but I'm not sold on ODIs yet. We weren't wrong to be skeptical.
Hopefully he's one of those rare players who performs better at the top level than the domestic level.
Except tests, because if he translates his recent FC record to tests I'll be pretty happy.
Yeah he is.Mahmudullah is not a tailender.
You'd have a better chance convincing me that Raqibul was a tailender.Yeah he is.
Spin on. Are they targeting Watling early?
Both are tbh.You'd have a better chance convincing me that Raqibul was a tailender.
It worked. Sounds like he was never comfortable.Spin on. Are they targeting Watling early?
He's going to love India.It worked. Sounds like he was never comfortable.