• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* New Zealand in Bangladesh 2010

Flem274*

Flem274*

123/5
fishyguy said:
I'm comfortable enough with my ***uality to compliment a man if he's good lookin. And look i'm only jealous of his looks especially that head a hair. Wonder what shampoo he uses.
Click to expand...
Haha wasn't meant to be derogatory, it's just you turned up from no where and started posting about his hair so I just had to make a lame joke of it.:p
 
BeeGee

BeeGee

International Captain
All these leg side deliveries are frustrating. Is this a team tactic? 90% of Bangladesh's runs have come on the leg side.
 
Flem274*

Flem274*

123/5
Prince EWS said:
I don't deep down think that even Michael Davidson is a better bowler; I swear...



You just want to see my hype Ingram up! Deal though; I can just play Bartlett then. Ingram and Bartlett replacing Worker and Bennett in my team would be a real upgrade. :p
Click to expand...
Michael Davidson's 4/1 in the final a few years back was gun.

Nah I'm keeping Ingram.:p Mock him all you like, still averages 60 in the sim which is the real indicator of how good a playa is! Heef to confirm.
 
Prince EWS

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Flem274* said:
Michael Davidson's 4/1 in the final a few years back was gun.

Nah I'm keeping Ingram.:p Mock him all you like, still averages 60 in the sim which is the real indicator of how good a playa is! Heef to confirm.
Click to expand...
Sinclair > Ingram though. In fact Sinclair > every batsman except the h4xing Vettori and Franklin.
 
Last edited:
Prince EWS

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Flem274* said:
All of the above>Ryder:ph34r:
Click to expand...
I think we all know Ryder wouldn't take that competition seriously at all. If anyone complained he'd down another pint and tell them he was New Zealand cricket. That he's going to average 45 ish is probably generous. :p
 
Zinzan

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Just got home, despite losing 3 wickets Bang seem to be traveling along at a great rate of knots, anything above 250 will be too much for NZ against their spinners me thinks (unless Taylor plays a blinder), have no confidence in any of our other batsmen atm, particularly since Ryder is injured.

Ouch - unlucky Vettori, that LBW looked plumb, can't think what the umpire thought that was missing
 
Zinzan

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Bennett seems to have some reasonable raw pace, just a shame his run-up is so disjointed & ordinary looking. Hopefully Bond can assist him with that.

Anyone else reckon we're missing Guptill's electric fielding in ODI's?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top