aussie
Hall of Fame Member
If all the above are fit & playign to potential all indeed should be ahead of Young. But Young i'd say has caught up with Lennon his given injury problems since the end of last season & the fact with arrivla of VDV @ spurs. He is likely to get less game time to impress - while Young consistent form & 1st team chances will most likely give him preference over Lennon for upcomign squad selection this season.Not better to go off domestic form if they've played a higher level IMO.
I would also question what has changed that would now make him a definite pick in a squad - could easily argue for Milner, Cole, Johnson, Walcott and Lennon to all have bigger claims for a spot than him and there's not many managers name 6 wingers in a 23.
What does club performances have to do with his international record?.GingerFurball said:Joe Cole's claim for a spot is that he scored a cracking goal against Manchester United 5 years ago. Not exactly a strong case.
There's a reason Chelsea let him go and a reason he's at Liverpool.
Cole was a fixture on the left for ENG between WC 06 qualifiers to WC 2010 qualifers up until he got that injury in Zagreb vs Croatia 2008. Which then caused him to miss most of the 08/09 season for Chelsea & when he came back in the 09/10, he took a while to return to his best.
Ancelotti wasn't too pleased with his progress last season & sort of lost faith in his ability & let him go. But once Cole gets a manager who believes in his ability he will always do well. Cole must always be in the national squad, ENG dont have the luxury nor quality depth to drop such a player.