Agree. Should have been at least three. Surely has to be an odd number as well.I'll say this:
Two test series, esp. between two powerhouse nations = worst idea ever.
i am happy we have at least 2 test matchesAgree. Should have been at least three. Surely has to be an odd number as well.
LOL......Why didn't Hauritz pull out his mystery ball?
...the one that turns.
No one in Australia has under-rated Laxman since the Sydney test in 2000.Averages 50+ when you take out the part of his career when he was forced to open, tbh. Probably the most under rated batsman of the past decade simply by virtue of being stranded on the wrong side of a number.
Don't get him to throw you a bottle of beer.Was Steve. Don't think he'll appreciate any ribbing next time I see him at the pub
Indeed. Laxman's ability to pull off a near impossible chase, like this one became (by lunch) is unmatched.No one in Australia has under-rated Laxman since the Sydney test in 2000.
Deserves 5 tbh.I'll say this:
Two test series, esp. between two powerhouse nations = worst idea ever.
VVS Laxman is Scorpio (Born November 1) , He is a man of intensity, in everything he does.
Yeah, had the other nations in mind, tbh. Man always stands up to be counted in tough situations, is glorious to watch, but never seems to get a mention in the best batsmen discussions.No one in Australia has under-rated Laxman since the Sydney test in 2000.
Series between India, Australia, England and South Africa (Sri Lanka I guess too) all deserve to be 3-5 test series with 3 ODIs and 2 T20s.Deserves 5 tbh.
Did get a fairly bad decision in the second to be fair.I wonder whether India need to think about replacing Gambhir, he's failed in his last 7 innings. Ishant has to play the next game as well now. Some of our batsmen need to look at their modes of dismissal when they could have really pushed on and batted Australia out of the game.. particularly in the first innings.
Yeah. But it was a bit disconcerting the way he sort of plonked the foot forward to that delivery.Did get a fairly bad decision in the second to be fair.
Other nations don't really matter though...
Yeah, had the other nations in mind, tbh. Man always stands up to be counted in tough situations, is glorious to watch, but never seems to get a mention in the best batsmen discussions.
I don't think you can drop someone with a Test and First Class record as good as Gambhir's after seven failures. He is in bad form, but we simply cannot replace and undermine someone of Gambhir's quality based on a short run of very poor form.I wonder whether India need to think about replacing Gambhir, he's failed in his last 7 innings. Ishant has to play the next game as well now. Some of our batsmen need to look at their modes of dismissal when they could have really pushed on and batted Australia out of the game.. particularly in the first innings.
Gambhir is just fine.. He got a bad decision.. I dont think his form is bad..I wonder whether India need to think about replacing Gambhir, he's failed in his last 7 innings. Ishant has to play the next game as well now. Some of our batsmen need to look at their modes of dismissal when they could have really pushed on and batted Australia out of the game.. particularly in the first innings.
But where would the lulz come from if not for the teams that choke, get beaten 5-0, collapse dramatically and inexplicably, punch above their weight, cling onto memories of decades past etc etc?Other nations don't really matter though...