ankitj
Hall of Fame Member
Allow me to post it, within quotes, on FacebookVVS, as stated, is not a man but some sort of Australia-crushing run-scoring alien construct.
Allow me to post it, within quotes, on FacebookVVS, as stated, is not a man but some sort of Australia-crushing run-scoring alien construct.
Blame the ******** kid batting six FFS!Even before the game began today, Pasag and others said that giving batsman singles when they are with the tail is bad captaincy.
Yousuf showed it in the Sydney test this year.
Ponting did that when they were 8 down. Australia lost.
I think when you criticise something before it happens saying it will cause a loss. And there is a loss, you can criticise the captain.
Is it just me or does Australia seem to lose more than their fair share of close run Test matches?
Or is it that someone defeating Australia in a close run match simply happens to be more memorable?
(Not suggesting for a moment that Australia are set to give SAF a run for their money as top Test chokers).
No issues, you can even say I'm an Aussie if you like.Allow me to post it, within quotes, on Facebook
I don't understand why North is relevant at the moment when you need 2 wickets to win, and the opposition need 90+ runs to win.Blame the ******** kid batting six FFS!
What are you going on about?lol typical...they start crying when they are on the receiving end....
edit...:appropriate smiley face:
Agree with all of this.I don't understand why North is relevant at the moment when you need 2 wickets to win, and the opposition need 90+ runs to win.
North is ****, sure. Clarke batted **** too by the way. Hauritz bowled poo as well.
Lots of reasons for the loss. But Ponting's captaincy today is one of those reasons.
You must have done something goodNever seen so many people get pissed off. Social, DeusEx, Got_spin... so angry at me telling them their team was better and would win
No doubt you can criticise him, but the carry-on like it's the deciding fact in a match everytime is utter rubbish imho. So many things from all 11 players that could have been done differently that MAY have changed the outcome of the match.Even before the game began today, Pasag and others said that giving batsman singles when they are with the tail is bad captaincy.
Yousuf showed it in the Sydney test this year.
Ponting did that when they were 8 down. Australia lost.
I think when you criticise something before it happens saying it will cause a loss. And there is a loss, you can criticise the captain.
Of course I will. It won't be much fun without that!No issues, you can even say I'm an Aussie if you like.
Mate, no posting like this,.lol typical...they start crying when they are on the receiving end....
edit...:appropriate smiley face:
If you're not good enough (North), you're not good enough.No doubt you can criticise him, but the carry-on like it's the deciding fact in a match everytime is utter rubbish imho. So many things from all 11 players that could have been done differently that MAY have changed the outcome of the match.
...LOLWhy is the entire population of Mohali up on the presentation stage?
Yeah exactly. Especially because you can't call North's innings crunch moments where the match is there to be won or lost.If you're not good enough (North), you're not good enough.
If you can win, but make bad tactical moves, you're fair game.
So wish you were here in 07..lol typical...they start crying when they are on the receiving end....
edit...:appropriate smiley face:
I think the reason for this loss is the same story as always for the Australian team. The middle order. Its as simple as that.No doubt you can criticise him, but the carry-on like it's the deciding fact in a match everytime is utter rubbish imho. So many things from all 11 players that could have been done differently that MAY have changed the outcome of the match.
That's another big reason obv. Hussey and North are past it (though technically North was never there in the first place) but when Ponting and Clarke decide to be retards, leaves a lot for Watto, Katich and the bowlers to do.I think the reason for this loss is the same story as always for the Australian team. The middle order. Its as simple as that.
We have scraped through our fair share as well - Pak in Syd, India in Syd (although both are tainted for different reasons), South Africa at home where Smith batted with a dud arm.Is it just me or does Australia seem to lose more than their fair share of close run Test matches?
Or is it that someone defeating Australia in a close run match simply happens to be more memorable?
(Not suggesting for a moment that Australia are set to give SAF a run for their money as top Test chokers).