The Best of The Rest - NZ, WI, Pak, Bang in tests

[WindieWeathers]

One test?

One test can win you a series remember?

Of course you do.

Yeah but the facts are the facts, we remained unbeaten in our series, they didn't .

 

[WindieWeathers]

There is a logic.

WI>>>>>>>>Than they actually are.

Distorting my views again?!!!

I've always said

Sa, Ind, Eng, Aus and SL>>>>>>WI so wtf are you talking about?

Oops silly me i don't agree that the likes of Pak, Bang and NZ are better than us!!, what a crime!!.

 

[WindieWeathers]

my ears hurt

I'm guessing it was the frivolous post above yours that did the damage!! .

 

[Johnners]

It appears none of you appear to be able to debate in a civil manner. I've already close and re-opened this thread once, this is a final warning to keep it on track, or it will be closed permanently.

Windie - Posting in capitals is quite simply infuriating, it doesn't add anything to any argument, and it doesn't make a point any more or less valid - cut it out (see forum rules as well...)

Jezroy/GF/Flem etc., regardless of what you think of WW, your posting towards him, and baiting of him is just as bad as what you're accusing him of. Cut it out now, as you're only making yourself look like fools.

This whole "feud" is a topic currently being discussed by the mod-team, and our patience is wearing thin with all of you. Keep it civil, or bans will be handed out. Any more crap will be deleted, and the thread closed. If you want to discuss this further with the mod team, email us on "moderators@cricketweb.net" or send me a VM.

 

[Bahnz]

Huh, and everything seemed to be going so well yesterday...

 

[Hurricane]

@Clapo don't close this thread - I follow it closely.

Pak bowling >>>> WI bowling
Pak batting < NZ WI Bangers

Pak batting will return to NZ standard with the addition of Yousuf and would equal or better WI with the addition of Younis.

I think NZ has the greatest batting potential with the addition of Williamson and Myburgh 12 months from now. But the only direction is up for NZ tbh

Myburgh > Nash

 

[Migara]

It appears none of you appear to be able to debate in a civil manner. I've already close and re-opened this thread once, this is a final warning to keep it on track, or it will be closed permanently.

Windie - Posting in capitals is quite simply infuriating, it doesn't add anything to any argument, and it doesn't make a point any more or less valid - cut it out (see forum rules as well...)

Jezroy/GF/Flem etc., regardless of what you think of WW, your posting towards him, and baiting of him is just as bad as what you're accusing him of. Cut it out now, as you're only making yourself look like fools.

This whole "feud" is a topic currently being discussed by the mod-team, and our patience is wearing thin with all of you. Keep it civil, or bans will be handed out. Any more crap will be deleted, and the thread closed. If you want to discuss this further with the mod team, email us on "moderators@cricketweb.net" or send me a VM.

He did not post the whole thing in CAPITALS. He was highlighting them. How is using capitals for a part of a sentence infuriate and signatures in huge size 18 fonts go un-noticed?

 

[Flem274*]

He did not post the whole thing in CAPITALS. He was highlighting them. How is using capitals for a part of a sentence infuriate and signatures in huge size 18 fonts go un-noticed?

Allow ME to DEMONSTRATE. The warning was fair enough.

Moving on, Hurricane, what about Gayle and Chanderpaul? Do the lesser WI batsmen cancel them out? Even if we do add in Williamson and Ryder, we still have two pretty meh openers.

Expand?

And Myburgh vs Nash could be interesting or short lived if he follows the usual NZ top 3 route.

 

[_Ed_]

WW has been banned now I see. Thanks to whoever did that.

 

[G.I.Joe]

Gawd no! Who's going to hook us up with Brazilian hawties now?

 

[Shri]

Banned for how long?

 

[Flem274*]

Cheers to the mods.

 

[Flem274*]

Banned for how long?

They might post it in the ban announcements thread, but it is closed...

 

[andyc]

He's been banned for two months for his continuing confrontational posting manner and for being the common denominator in a lot of threads which have been dragged off topic and resulted in mod intervention.

 

[Migara]

Allow ME to DEMONSTRATE. The warning was fair enough

No it isn't. Few words in caps cannot be as ugly as a point size 18 signature which is occurring for umpteen times. I've used ti many times, and never warned, because I was not touching on the nerves of you as WW, or to say bit generous. Warnings should be fair.

 

[Neil Pickup]

No it isn't. Few words in caps cannot be as ugly as a point size 18 signature which is occurring for umpteen times. I've used ti many times, and never warned, because I was not touching on the nerves of you as WW, or to say bit generous. Warnings should be fair.

If somebody is warned and they subsequently refuse to amend their behaviour, then consequences must follow or else your moderation loses all credibility.

Andy has let everyone know why WW has been banned, and we don't need to bring the topic of his posting back up here again. Let's try to get back to the subject.

 

[Hurricane]

Moving on, Hurricane, what about Gayle and Chanderpaul? Do the lesser WI batsmen cancel them out? Even if we do add in Williamson and Ryder, we still have two pretty meh openers.

Expand?

And Myburgh vs Nash could be interesting or short lived if he follows the usual NZ top 3 route.

Edit taking down my analysis due to a rough reception - see following posts.

 

[Athlai]

Taylor and Vettori have averaged 50 over the past few years.

 

[Howsie]

Hmmm, that's a very simplistic way to rate future potential.

 

[vic_orthdox]

That's some of the cruder analysis I've seen in quite some time.