• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Official Pro-Wrestling Thread (WWE, TNA, ROH etc.)

Status
Not open for further replies.

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
Are Legacy really over? Are they taken that seriously? I think they are rather 'blah' to be honest and just relevant because of Orton. But that's not neccessarily the fault of Triple H and Shawn Michaels. Cody Rhodes and Ted DiBiase are just incredibly bland.

Aside from Jericho and the big three, I think Booker T and RVD when they were both really, really popular back in 2002 and 2003 definitely deserved the rub. The likes of Kane and Big Show have never really gotten a fair shake from Triple H either.
I agree entirely RE: Legacy. Cody Rhodes in particular strikes me as being totally generic. Ted DiBiase has promise though, but the way he has been built up has probably confused the audience somewhat. Orton now ending up as a face of sorts in this feud thing they have going strikes me as being totally the wrong way to have gone about it.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
Fair enough. Not gonna get into a debate with you as well, I'm working (ish) :ph34r: and I like you too much for things to get heated :laugh:

But

1. Triple H was never meant to be a Foley. We were always meant to believe that he was the best guy going around. While in the 02 feud he never did much for Jericho, let's not forget that Triple H set Y2J on his way to superstardom. He made him look a million dollars all year long, he may have won their LMS but buy did he put Jericho over. And I don't need something to be 'groundbreaking' for it to be good - I just need it to be good. Triple H had all the requirements for what I want out of a top wrestler, personally.

2. Can't agree on Ric Flair, pretty sure we've been there before though.

3. Kane was never worth anything after his one-night title reign in my eyes.

4. Fair enough on Shawn. I don't really care what people like are outside of the ring, just like most of my favourite footballers and cricketers are probably wankers.

On a side note, silver vision are having a Mania sale and I've just ordered the 19 DVD, haha.
Personally I think Kane during his run between 03 and 04 was worth the rub as much as anyone else on the roster at the time. He was incredibly over and his matches throughout that period were probably the best he ever had. I'm not saying he would have been an incredible world champ for sure, but he sure as hell would have been worth a shot imo. Particularly when so much time around that period was filled up with HHH feuding with Kevin Nash and Scott Steiner etc...

Agree on RVD though, much as I like him I appreciate that him being given a world title run at that stage would have been a very risky move.

I'm a fan of Flair, but I would agree with Duffer to an extent, his general ability for mine is quite overated. However he is like Foley in terms of how he can get others over and I can't think of many better bumpers. His Star Quality is nearly unmatched as well. Shame he seems to be an absolute tool and unable to let go of wrestling these days.

With regards to HBK, I would say he's done quite well of not ramming the born again stuff down anyones throat for quite a while now, and since him becoming one, he actually strikes me as being a genuinely nicer guy for it. Not that I care much for what people are like away from the ring (with notable exceptions; Dave Batista WAC), but the fact that guys like Jericho are supposedly very genuine and decent people away from the camera just makes me like them more.
 
Last edited:

GotSpin

Hall of Fame Member
Personally I think Kane during his run between 03 and 04 was worth the rub as much as anyone else on the roster at the time. He was incredibly over and his matches throughout that period were probably the best he ever had. I'm not saying he would have been an incredible world champ for sure, but he sure as hell would have been worth a shot imo. Particularly when so much time around that period was filled up with HHH feuding with Kevin Nash and Scott Steiner etc...
Yeah I agree. Kane was huge for a while. Such a shame.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
I don't think I'll ever watch a better PPV or wrestling card ever. Can safely say it too.

Besides, My Way as the theme song...cant be beat.
What really sucks is that on the DVD release (or at least subsequent DVD releases) they lost the copyright and have dubbed over it with some other generic rock track, which sucks balls. Particularly seeing as the whole Rock/Austin promo thing was built around My Way.
 

GotSpin

Hall of Fame Member
What really sucks is that on the DVD release (or at least subsequent DVD releases) they lost the copyright and have dubbed over it with some other generic rock track, which sucks balls. Particularly seeing as the whole Rock/Austin promo thing was built around My Way.
That's devastating. Oh well, there are still the original promos on youtube. So good to watch.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
I agree entirely RE: Legacy. Cody Rhodes in particular strikes me as being totally generic. Ted DiBiase has promise though, but the way he has been built up has probably confused the audience somewhat. Orton now ending up as a face of sorts in this feud thing they have going strikes me as being totally the wrong way to have gone about it.
Disagree, I think orton as an anti-face makes sense. Let's be honest, when he was killing Triple H's family last year he was getting cheered anyway. There was no way people would cheer for Legacy over him. He is turning without changing and that's the important thing. See, Stone Cold, 1997.

What really sucks is that on the DVD release (or at least subsequent DVD releases) they lost the copyright and have dubbed over it with some other generic rock track, which sucks balls. Particularly seeing as the whole Rock/Austin promo thing was built around My Way.
If you buy the tagged classics it has everything in the original format, including no blurring of the F. That's the copy I have.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
RE Flair, it baffles me to hear people say that if you've seen one match, you've seen them all, I just can't buy into that at all.

Now granted, I think it might have been for the best if he'd retired when WCW went, but if you look at his match quality from the 80s and early 90s, they were different, each one telling its own story, and as sledger alluded to, he is the best of all-time at making other people look good (I reckon Foley is a close second). His early battles with Harley Race are something very special.

Again, it's all opinion, so I am not assuming that people haven't seen his early matches, I just can't understand how anyone could watch his old stuff and consider him overrated or generic.

Add to the fact that the 92 Rumble may be the single greatest wrestling performance of all-time, aided in no short measure by amazing commentary from Heenan.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
WWE has updated the wellness policy, to update the Impact Concussion Management Program. Basically, no chair shots to the head. Here is how it reads…

WWE has eliminated using folding metal chairs to "strike" an opponent in the head. The WWE penalizes through fine and/or suspension the following:

-- The intentional use of a folding metal chair to "strike" an opponent in the head.
A fair enough move in my eyes, can see why they have done it, but a bit of a shame. Chairshots were awesome. Remember a Matt Hardy one on Brock Lesnar, simply owned.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
Disagree, I think orton as an anti-face makes sense. Let's be honest, when he was killing Triple H's family last year he was getting cheered anyway. There was no way people would cheer for Legacy over him. He is turning without changing and that's the important thing. See, Stone Cold, 1997.
Hmmm, I'm not so sure, the guy is meant to be a seriously evil bad-ass heel...something about the whole dynamic just doesn't sit right for me. I honestly think that had Ted DiBiase been turned face by himself and Cody Rhodes had been left to stick with Orton or just straight out go away for some reason it would have worked out ok. It still will probably be fine, just strikes me as a strange way of doing things.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Anyone catch NXT?

Good show again. Probably the weakest one yet, but that was mainly because it lacked The Miz! I won't give much more away as it's not aired over here on TV yet so don't want to give out spoilers
 

duffer

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Full blooded head to chair contact (ala Rock and Mankind) should be banned. However most chair spots generally allow for a guy to try and absorb the main impact using arms or anything. Decent move, but I'll miss them.
 

wfdu_ben91

International 12th Man
I'm not a Triple H hater, but the 03/04 period is clearly where he acquired his reputation. I don't personally think he's been too bad after that.
HHH is just exremely smart in who he jobs to. He tapped out to Chris Benoit who albeit was a great wrestler, wasn't very charismatic and he tapped out to Cena who is a great entertainer, but not a very good wrestler. He wouldn't ever tapout to someone like Kurt Angle and Chris Jericho who are the total package (as in they can entertain and wrestle).
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
GIMH, how did Triple H set Jericho on his way to stardom? I just disagree with that statement so much.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
GIMH, how did Triple H set Jericho on his way to stardom? I just disagree with that statement so much.
GIMH?

Has Jericho ever beaten HHH?
Because it was Jericho's feud with Triple H in 2000 that first saw him main event a PPV and first got him involved with the big guys. He beat HHH for the title in 2000 only for the decision to be reversed - the win meant nothing but the fact that he would be involved in such an angle did. And then in their LMS, Triple H beat him by half a second and couldn't stand after the match. You don't have to lose to someone to put him over and Jericho shouldn't have won that match, but it was a hell of a lot closer than you'd expect.

Of course Jericho had done a lot by himself to get over, and he went back to the midcard for a while after that, but because of that feud with Triple H he was always credible and could always be taken seriously as a challenger to the guys at the top.

He was way over, but his work with Triple H through the spring and early summer of 2000, culminating in the LMS at Fully Loaded, sent him really on his way. All os a sudden he was tagging with The Rock on Raw and Smackdown main events.

Their feud in 2002 of course was the opposite.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top