Haha yeah. You guys keep mentioning how good the show is but it's on Friday nights and Sunday afternoons here which is a pretty dire time for me so i never get the chance to try it.
fair
edit - IIRC you don't really watch Smackdown either, so that would make a lot of sense on that front
Will be hard to trump 20 or 21 imo, but it should be the best since either of those by a fair stretch. Don't want to get my hopes up too much though, just because of how it was all shaping up great last year only to end up with a totally dross card, and one match that is probably the greatest I've ever seen.The whole build is great and you kinda know where they are going but at the same time, don't. Mania should be stacked this year, best one since 19 is on the cards
The difference with last year is that it's looking like we'll see fresh ideas that we haven't seen in the last few years, save maybe HBK-Taker which will be awesome anyway, if it happens. If you look last year, though things were building up fairly well (HHH-Orton had a great build for example) there wasn't anything everyone was dying to see. People wanna see Edge and Jericho go at it. Everyone has wanted to see Vince in the sharpshooter for 12 years. DX have never fought each other at Mania - or Taker has never given a rematch the following year. And I think Cena and Batista have only had one high profile match, and that was face v face. Bear in mind I've not even considered the WWE title in any of this and the distinct possibility that I might have called some of these wrong, and it's why it's such compelling viewing at the moment. We really could be looking at a supercard. I think X7 is the best Mania, but 19 had the stacked card, for me.Will be hard to trump 20 or 21 imo, but it should be the best since either of those by a fair stretch. Don't want to get my hopes up too much though, just because of how it was all shaping up great last year only to end up with a totally dross card, and one match that is probably the greatest I've ever seen.
Bit sad, always quite liked that event. Back in the day when there were enough tag teams/stables to make the match type quite enjoyable this was always good value. Not in favour of them adding any more gimmick themed PPVs to the calender. Unless it's War Games, always loved that. Have to doubt that will happen mind, it being a WCW idea and all.Vince McMahon stated during this morning's WWE conference call that the WWE Survivor Series title is "obsolete." He added that the title has "outlasted its usage" and that they do not intend on using the name going forward.
"We think that Survivor Series is obsolete, as far as that title is concerned," McMahon said. It was something that worked many, many years ago, in terms of a creative standpoint, various teams competing. That really is not advantageous as the consumer now looks as what actually they are buying. And it's such a broad ... Survivor Series yes, many years ago, was one of the original four pay-per-views, but it's outlasted its usage and it is one of the things in terms of rebranding, this year and going forward, that will be rebranded. No longer will we have that title, Survivor Series."
While WWE's new gimmick-themed pay-per-view events out-performed their 2008 counterparts, last year's Survivor Series took a sharp hit as the show drew 235,000 buys, down 26% from 2008 (319,000).
Yeah pretty much, two rings, big cage with a roof. Epic memorys include Ric Flair having his head slammed in the cage door whilst some fan in the background goes nuts.War Games is the cell on a cell on a cell, right?
Yeah, it was a good PPV but really didn't have that 'big show' feel to it, it wasn't well built-up. Whereas the other three are always hyped.****ing loved War Games. Arguably the greatest thing to come out of WCW. That buy rate for a "big 4" PPV is pretty shocking though. 235k? Wow, are you kidding me?
Would agree that Survivor Series has lost its value. The only way that I could see it being any value, whilst keeping the name if it were to be a King of the Ring concept (something which I quite enjoyed) with the winner getting a title shot either on the night or at a later time.Bit sad, always quite liked that event. Back in the day when there were enough tag teams/stables to make the match type quite enjoyable this was always good value. Not in favour of them adding any more gimmick themed PPVs to the calender. Unless it's War Games, always loved that. Have to doubt that will happen mind, it being a WCW idea and all.