Top_Cat
Request Your Custom Title Now!
What Andre said. Geez.Dont know if he had an injury playing in the bigbash. But Bollinger just exposed a regular weakness in his technique that has been evident for years there.
What Andre said. Geez.Dont know if he had an injury playing in the bigbash. But Bollinger just exposed a regular weakness in his technique that has been evident for years there.
Oh ok. But the point about his technical deficiency still stands.He missed half the tournament after he got injured in the first match!
Absolutely reckon he's still not 100% - side strains take a fair whack of time to recover from. But he is a lot more committed than he gives off so it's not easy to keep him off the field.
DWTA. His exploits in the test series show that you are wrong about Gayle.The sooner we stop relying on that inconsistent clown "Chris Gayle" the better , like i said before i simply cannot wait for Brathwaite to come through, even now the kid seems to have a better cricketing brain than Chris, i just don't think Gayle gives a f#ck about the game anymore and to add insult to injury he's a sh1t captain, he should be embarrassed with his performances thus far.
AND NOW IT'S 3 FOR 11? and people wonder why i wanted big changes?!! i hope you're enjoying the game Gayle and Williams!!.
Like it needs to be made again, FFS.Oh ok. But the point about his technical deficiency still stands.
Oh geez what??. After all the years Gayle has played againts Australia have you not seen him dismissed like that LBW or bowled countless times??What Andre said. Geez.
WTF is your damn problem. If you want question my position out on Gayle, debate me on it. WTF you cursing me out for, like if you just wash your mouth with piss. Rest yourself..Like it needs to be made again, FFS.
Don't know if getting a slightly off-pace good rock first up can be classed as a 'technical deficiency' to be honest.Oh ok. But the point about his technical deficiency still stands.
I only asked about his injury. Your point about his 'technical deficiency', whether true or not, is completely irrelevant.WTF is your damn problem. If you want question my position out on Gayle, debate me on it. WTF you cursing me out for, like if you just wash your mouth with piss. Rest yourself..
Gayle doesn't move his feet. Once a bowler like Bollinger is capable is swinging the ball back into his pads he is super vulnerable early one. Hilfenhaus did in in 1st test of the summer & Lee has got him that way many times in past AUS vs WI clashes.Don't know if getting a slightly off-pace good rock first up can be classed as a 'technical deficiency' to be honest.
And did i not say "i dont know if he was injured"?. Me mentioning the technical flaw was just me making a comment geez. How did it then justify you cursing out i'll never knowI only asked about his injury. Your point about his 'technical deficiency', whether true or not, is completely irrelevant.
Neither does Sehwag, and he's the best player in the world right now..Gayle doesn't move his feet. Once a bowler like Bollinger is capable is swinging the ball back into his pads he is super vulnerable early one. Hilfenhaus did in in 1st test of the summer & Lee has got him that way many times in past AUS vs WI clashes.
Do you know what "inconsistent" means? the man is a clown it's as simple as that, it's all about what "mood" he's in on the day, nothing else and more often than not we're paying the price for it, i'd take Barath over that idiot anyday of the week because he actually puts some thought into what he's doing at the crease.DWTA. His exploits in the test series show that you are wrong about Gayle.
This innings was somewhat thoughtful.Do you know what "inconsistent" means? the man is a clown it's as simple as that, it's all about what "mood" he's in on the day, nothing else and more often than not we're paying the price for it, i'd take Barath over that idiot anyday of the week because he actually puts some thought into what he's doing at the crease.
Mark Waugh was inconsistent too. Most natural strikers of the ball appear to be more inconsistent than more technically inclined batsmen. That doesn't mean they don't work as hard. It just means that people naturally assume that they are lazy when they get out, because the rest of the time they look so good.Do you know what "inconsistent" means? the man is a clown it's as simple as that, it's all about what "mood" he's in on the day, nothing else and more often than not we're paying the price for it, i'd take Barath over that idiot anyday of the week because he actually puts some thought into what he's doing at the crease.
Yeah that was when he was "in the mood" which happens once in a blue moon, have you seen his score today?This innings was somewhat thoughtful.
2nd Test: Australia v West Indies at Adelaide, Dec 4-8, 2009 | Cricket Scorecard | Cricinfo.com
Sehwag is far better than Gayle as a test batsman regardless of similarities in their techniques. Sehwag also probably being the best player/batsman in the world on form (although i'd put Kallis ahead of him easily ATM), does exactly mean he is a convincing batsmen in againts consistent quality bowling.Neither does Sehwag, and he's the best player in the world right now..
So? Blaming one batter for the failure of an entire team is bollocks. That and he got a decent nut.Yeah that was when he was "in the mood" which happens once in a blue moon, have you seen his score today?
Yes, infact I had time to see his whole innings today. He got a ball that pitched on middle, swung away and hit his pad in front of off stump. Hardly threw it away or had a brain explosion.Yeah that was when he was "in the mood" which happens once in a blue moon, have you seen his score today?