0RI0N
State 12th Man
Just because you don't like what it shows doesn't mean it's of no relevance.
Calm down bro because
http://rlv.zcache.com/barack_obama_you_mad_flyer-p2445590346952536242mcvz_400.jpg
Just because you don't like what it shows doesn't mean it's of no relevance.
lol.. that would perhaps apply to a few other posters here as well..What the **** would you know Burgey? It's abundantly clear you don't need to actually do something to know everything you need to know about it.
facts..Dude what are you even going on about
Absolute incoherent dribbler
If you can spell the singular of "potatoes" and reasonably pronounce "nuclear", you'd be doing better than many for whom it is so. (English is, by now, an Indian language, and many Indians don't have to, or shouldn't have to, use that cop-out)I am sorry that English is not my first language..
Lays, Nuke.If you can spell the singular of "potatoes" and reasonably pronounce "nuclear", you'd be doing better than many for whom it is so. (English is, by now, an Indian language, and many Indians don't have to, or shouldn't have to, use that cop-out)
Your English is not the problem.I am sorry that English is not my first language..
of course, i agree. but im just trying to clarify on when you said that murali was probably not even remotely influenced by saqlain.Murali's stock-ball is a completely different delivery than Saqlain's stock-ball; likewise, Murali's Wrong-'Un is a completely different delivery than Saqlain's Doosra.
If Murali says he was "inspired" to bowl a Wrong-'Un by Saqlain it's clearly true, but it's no more bowling the same ball as the fact that Mark David Chapman was inspired to murder John Lennon by The Catcher In The Rye was Chapman doing the same as the author.
Murali's ball which turns the other way is a completely different ball to anything else that has ever been bowled, and being the phenomenal bowler he is I rather doubt that if he'd not had Saqlain to give him the idea of bowling a Wrong-'Un he'd not have found someone else to do so.
Will people stop talking about ODIs? This is CricketWeb.net - here, discussion centres around Test cricket unless otherwise stated. There is some amount of case for Saqlain being better in ODIs than Murali at some point, but in Tests there is no contest, was better (often miles better) than Saqlain all career, end of.
Jim Laker & Hugh Trumble probably?Harbhajan is without doubt the greatest ever finger spinner to come from Punjab, and also play for Surrey and Lancashire
If one took away Murali (disqualified for using his wrist more than his fingers) the best finger spinners one has seen would rank something like this.
- Prasanna
- Bedi
- Gibbs
- Underwood
- Saqlain
Its early morning where I am after a very late night so I may have missed someone but no one that would displace the top three anyway.
Oh yeah forgot himWell, for me, it's got to be Pat Symcox innit?
Come on Aussie, I just turned 60 not 160Jim Laker & Hugh Trumble probably?
lol... since when is a fact a cop out...If you can spell the singular of "potatoes" and reasonably pronounce "nuclear", you'd be doing better than many for whom it is so. (English is, by now, an Indian language, and many Indians don't have to, or shouldn't have to, use that cop-out)
so, facts are?Your English is not the problem.
What complete and utter tripe.Saqlain was also better at tests than murali was in his prime if you look at their economy rates and the amount of wickets tooken in amount of matches in the years of which saqlain was in his prime(1990-2001) and in the years murali was in his prime (2004-2006), so im not sure where your getting your stats from man.