Jarquis
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I'm guessing somebody else dug this quote but lol anyway.Pretty average bowling from Hauritz, don't see him bowling Australia to victory. Up to Johnson and Bollinger.
I'm guessing somebody else dug this quote but lol anyway.Pretty average bowling from Hauritz, don't see him bowling Australia to victory. Up to Johnson and Bollinger.
Or this oneI like Hauritz as a bowler, he offers a nice option for Ponting. But he is never going to be one of those cricketers that takes 5/20 on the final day of play. His style relies on tempting the batsmen into playing the false stroke, when you have runs to play with that is fine, but he will generally concede 80-100 runs in the process of taking 3-4 wickets.
Yousuf should probably be telling them to send over another captain ASAP too.
And Mohammad Yousuf's captaincy was still very poor.If catching ability was even between Australia and Pakistan, Pakistan would have won by an innings.
Calm down.I've been saying this for years that not only Yousuf,Misbah and Kamran but also Butt,Farhat Kaneria,Sami,Shoaib Malik & Afridi should be dropped permanently.But they manage to become part of the team because "demand" of some idiot Pakistani fans & use of unfair means i.e 'Sifarish'.
And I couldn't stop laughing when Kaneria said to mediapersons that he's Pakistan's best spinner ever after crossing Abdul Qadir's tally of 236 wickets.IMO,he's Pakistan's worst spinner ever.Infact twice or probably thrice as worst as any other in Pakistan's hisory.And Akmal is without any doubt Pakistan's worst wicket keeper ever as well.Your batting should not be a reason to keep you in the team if you can't keep even if you have a batting average of 50.Our changed team could be consisting of tese players.
Azeem Ghumman
Khurram Manzoor
Younis Khan
Umar Akmal
Shehryar Ghani
Asim Kamal
Sarfaraz Ahmed
Tahir Khan
Mohammad Aamer
Mohammad Asif
Najaf Shah
And Ponting batted first. It's even.And Mohammad Yousuf's captaincy was still very poor.
And Yousuf's poor decision-making with a hint of bat batting, actually a big dollop of bat batting.And Ponting batted first. It's even.
Catching is what lost the match.
They would have won, certainly. But if captaincy ability was even Pakistan would have won the match too.If catching ability was even between Australia and Pakistan, Pakistan would have won by an innings.
You ought to check out the hisotry of chasing low scores in Sydney, before you suggest that Ponting's decision to bat first was bad.And Ponting batted first. It's even.
Catching is what lost the match.
Haa ye, the legend at his ultimate best then..Warneyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Ponting's poor captaincy is easier forgiven due to the resources at his disposal. And, of course, the home field advantage. It's far from even.And Ponting batted first. It's even.
Catching is what lost the match.
Hehe thanks, if you check back about 2-3 pages I dug up my earlier posts. More than happy to be proven wrong by Hauritz, no harm done.I'm guessing somebody else dug this quote but lol anyway.
Interesting to see one of the member's signature is "I hate Atul Sharma"
The saying 'history is bunk' fits well here.You ought to check out the hisotry of chasing low scores in Sydney, before you suggest that Ponting's decision to bat first was bad.