Don't be too harsh, South Africa aren't that desperate that they're willing to play Phil Hughes yet...South Africa are almost as bad as Australia at batting
Yeah go on.Also would it be okay if I lol'd at Phailip Hughes in this thread while i'm here?
lol!yeah go on.
Yes that is OKI love this man.
Also would it be okay if I lol'd at Phailip Hughes in this thread while i'm here?
CI to the rescue.41.2
Swann to Duminy, OUT, Swann strikes again! Sharply spinning delivery from round the wicket, catches Duminy's outside edge and Prior eagerly snaps it up. Second first-baller in a row for Duminy. Top delivery from Swann and South Africa are in real trouble.
JP Duminy c †Prior b Swann 0 (1m 1b 0x4 0x6) SR: 0.00
Duminy arrives at the wicket with South Africa tottering. He needs a good score both for himself and his team.
41.1
Swann to de Villiers, OUT, gone this time! Swann from round the wicket and de Villiers will kick himself, chipped to short midwicket. Soft dismissal just as South Africa were really making England sweat. Swann continues to cause trouble but he would concede he was lucky here.
AB de Villiers c Strauss b Swann 36 (84m 60b 4x4 0x6) SR: 60.00
England need a wicket here
just have a slight chuckle but dont overdo it ok.I love this man.
Also would it be okay if I lol'd at Phailip Hughes in this thread while i'm here?
Was wondering about that so had a look at the squad for that tour, and with Athers suggesting you wouldn't hit this guy back, my guess would be Chris 'Grizzly Adams. There are maybe one or two others, but he must be favourite. 'Bumble & Athers being prick teases here; Bumble "let it slip" that a fellow tourist clocked Swanneh in the gents (not a euphemism ) on our 99/00 tour and gave him a fat lip. Any guesses?
Good shout, actually. Was wondering if it might've been the tour's skipper, myself when Athers said he was "taken aback". Nass famously short-tempered, especially after a dismissal.Was wondering about that so had a look at the squad for that tour, and with Athers suggesting you wouldn't hit this guy back, my guess would be Chris 'Grizzly Adams. There are maybe one or two others, but he must be favourite. '
Yes Swann has to be the main reason why the 4 bowler attack has so far had its success. Not only does he contain but he threatens aswell, so it allows Strauss to set positive fields without leaking too many runs. Of course he bowls the long spells allowing the quicker to get their breaks and be rotated from the other end.Swann really making the difference in the England attack, at the start of the series I didn't think 4 bowlers would be enough but I have been proved wrong. With the Swann offering control & wickets it allows Strauss to rotate his seamers at the other end always keeping the pressure on.
Yes pretty sure Nasser's hand would have come worse off.Good shout, actually. Was wondering if it might've been the tour's skipper, myself when Athers said he was "taken aback". Nass famously short-tempered, especially after a dismissal.
Although with his fingers he'd probably have bust three or four on Swanneh's gob.
Both jinxed itYes Swann has to be the main reason why the 4 bowler attack has so far had its success. Not only does he contain but he threatens aswell, so it allows Strauss to set positive fields without leaking too many runs. Of course he bowls the long spells allowing the quicker to get their breaks and be rotated from the other end.
As I type this Swann goes for three boundaries in a row!!