roseboy64
Cricket Web Content Updater
They were going after it pretty much earlier.Aus would have gone for the win. We've already seen how they've fared with aggression today (every wicket just in case you were wondering).
They were going after it pretty much earlier.Aus would have gone for the win. We've already seen how they've fared with aggression today (every wicket just in case you were wondering).
When? Ponting's been the only one and that's pretty much just his natural game.They were going after it pretty much earlier.
Katich?When? Ponting's been the only one and that's pretty much just his natural game.
Katich has actually become pretty loose lately. If he decides he doesn't rate someone, he goes them.Katich?
Especially true after he gets to 50Katich has actually become pretty loose lately. If he decides he doesn't rate someone, he goes them.
Yea, old Australia would have gone for it - see Adelaide Test vs Eng Ashes seriesIt is such a pity this pitch is still a road. I agree with Taylor that Johnson should have come ahead and tried to smash around a bit. About 10 overs back Australia were still in with a chance of winning this. This sort of defensive negative cricket is not what one expects from the founders of modern aggressive test cricket.
To be fair, there is only one of those guys left in the teamIt is such a pity this pitch is still a road. I agree with Taylor that Johnson should have come ahead and tried to smash around a bit. About 10 overs back Australia were still in with a chance of winning this. This sort of defensive negative cricket is not what one expects from the founders of modern aggressive test cricket.
The only real way they could lose the series is by trying to smash it around. That might suit the people who want to see Australia lose, but why would anyone realistically expect us to take a risk like that?It is such a pity this pitch is still a road. I agree with Taylor that Johnson should have come ahead and tried to smash around a bit. About 10 overs back Australia were still in with a chance of winning this. This sort of defensive negative cricket is not what one expects from the founders of modern aggressive test cricket.