I personally would suggest you play the 10 year old who has taken about fifty wickets in age group cricket this year, making him a rather infinitely better prospect than any other bowler Surrey have produced in the last decade.Well it was about this time last year that Shoaib Akhtar was signed; hopefully this bowler will make more of an impression. Three CC matches remaining, but even if Surrey win all three promotion is unlikely, so I can't see the point really. Would be different if we were 7th in Division 1.
Yeah, it's a really odd signing from Surrey. Unless they're hoping he'll be back next summer, what's the point? Surely better to expose a youngster.Well it was about this time last year that Shoaib Akhtar was signed; hopefully this bowler will make more of an impression. Three CC matches remaining, but even if Surrey win all three promotion is unlikely, so I can't see the point really. Would be different if we were 7th in Division 1.
Same strip and the umpires declared the ground fit at 9.15am.What strip are Lancashire playing on?
Didn't look like there was another one prepared yesterday and I can't believe if they are playing on the same surface it has improved much.
Cricinfo only have Surrey playing with 9 men...Decent start by Surrey, but as they made 420+ in the first innings of their last two games,and lost both, it's too early to count any chickens.
Incidentally there seems to be a feeling among supporters (that I've spoken to) that Batty should stay next year and play as a specialist opener. There's something to be said for it. Frost hasn't done too badly at Warwickshire.
Just noticed Herath isn't playing in this one.
Indeed - it's all getting a bit predictable - will probably declare UDI and want Test status nextAs if Durham weren't good enough without the world's best batsman.