• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Tennis Thread

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Quality match though
Yeah that's what he was saying.

I don't think the commentators were promoting Hewitt/Roddick for its potential quality though. Generally the commentators are pro-Hewitt, and whatever that's fine. I'm sure British commentators do it with Murray and used to with Henman, American commentators with Roddick, Spanish commentators with Rafa etc. But it hasn't been this bad since the 2004 US Open IMO. Perhaps the 2005 Aust Open too.
 

vogue

International Vice-Captain
And to a fifth... Hewitt playing some great tennis...


they just showed Hewitts manager...big guy!...wouldnt want to argue with him..
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
How good is this!

I'm an Aussie and can't stand Hewitt but for a relatively old, injury-stuffed guy, he's playing out of his skin and Roddick is belting the cover off it in return

Just hope that either of these guys have enough in the tank to hammer Murray as this game is well above the snooze-fest he played vs Ferrero
 
Last edited:

superkingdave

Hall of Fame Member
Be interesting what happens about the umpire or the line judge in this game. Umpire told Roddick the line judge was a liar..wonder what the replay shows if possible
 

superkingdave

Hall of Fame Member
How good is this!

I'm an Aussie and can't stand Hewitt but for a relatively old, injury-stuffed guy, he's playing out of his skin and Roddick is belting the cover off it in return

Just hope that either of these guys have enough in the tank to hammer Murray as this game is well above the snooze-fest he played vs Ferrero
Reckon Murray might prefer to play Roddick, he's his pigeon and he reads his serve well, plus he'll just pump the ball to his backhand all day. Was amazed to see Hewitt and Murray have only played each other once before.

IMO would be a big shock if Murray didn't get through to the final (will be an even bigger shock if Fed doesn't take it out). Probably the best chance would be for Leyton to play him under the roof, not sure what the weather forecast is.
 

Simon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Love you so much
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Reckon Murray might prefer to play Roddick, he's his pigeon and he reads his serve well, plus he'll just pump the ball to his backhand all day. Was amazed to see Hewitt and Murray have only played each other once before.

IMO would be a big shock if Murray didn't get through to the final (will be an even bigger shock if Fed doesn't take it out). Probably the best chance would be for Leyton to play him under the roof, not sure what the weather forecast is.
Roddick is very one-paced (flat out from the base line) so that might suit Murray more than a Hewitt who would've given him far more variety

Havent been very impressed with Murray as he appears to be a human back-board more than a stroke maker but that could be enough to see off Roddick who tends to get frustrated when the ball keeps coming back

Not surprised that Hewitt and Murray havent played more as Murray's rise to prominence has coincided with Hewitt's decline/long injury layoffs
 
Last edited:

Magrat Garlick

Rather Mad Witch
Hewitt doesn't have that much more variety imo (think it was Roddick who came up with the craziest dropshot of the day - a cross court backhand which just stopped - and the long rallies often ended in Hewitt hitting at Roddick's body, not making him run at all), but he does have a better return, which could have been useful with Murray's serves being rather slow.

On the women's side, Dementyeva has lost 19 games in 10 sets and goes in as a 7/2 outsider. Possibly some kind of a record.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Murray has a 6-1 career record against Roddick (discounting the latter's walkover at Queens last year) and beat him in straight sets here way back in 2006, so about as confident as I can be with any British sports person/team.

Mind you, has a 6-2 record against Fed and far less confident there.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yes but no doubt it'll drop me down when I tip him in the semi and he loses to Federer. But you know I feel theres something in the air, can he actually win the thing?
You'll be like an overturned Mr Whippy van if he does.
 

Anil

Hall of Fame Member
if both play near the top of their game, it should be federer vs murray in the final...good run by tommy but not sure if his plan to "annoy" federer will work against what looks like a very relaxed and at-peace player...
 

Anil

Hall of Fame Member
Didn't read the article, but in the earlier rounds it was clear the court selection was based on looks alone.There's no reason to put Kirilenko and Dulko on Centre Court other than their looks though.

As I posted earlier in the thread, this article was pretty good IMO: Sets appeal: beauty aces talent at Wimbledon - Sport - theage.com.au
well none of those "beauties" are remaining so the organizers have to make do with the "ugly" players for the rest of the tournament...really, that this can happen at wimbledon is just another example of why it's difficult to take women's tennis seriously...
 

Top