Don't know Werther this has been posted here before but this thought is just bad
NDTV.com - Wimbledon 2009
Not a great way to start an article tbh, it was the Quarter Finals and given they play 2 on each court there's no way the top 4 seeds could play on centre court.article said:The top four seeds traditionally play their semi-finals on Wimbledon Centre Court, but that's not quite been the case in these championships.
think they where mentioning about earlier roundsNot a great way to start an article tbh, it was the Quarter Finals and given they play 2 on each court there's no way the top 4 seeds could play on centre court.
Anyway was hoping Fed-Karlovic would go at least 4 sets...gonna miss most of the Murray match now.
How does 'Semi Finals' = earlier roundsthink they where mentioning about earlier rounds
Cant imagine either of these guys winning it though - games simply arent big enoughMurray takes the first set...both guys playing well tho ..Murray just has that edge ..
then Ferrero breaks him in the first game of the second set!....
Cant imagine either of these guys winning it though - games simply arent big enough
Not a great way to start an article tbh, it was the Quarter Finals and given they play 2 on each court there's no way the top 4 seeds could play on centre court.
Anyway, not sure the reasoning behind it is sane, Centre court will be sold out months in advance of the order of play being announced and BBC claim they have nothing to do with it, so i'm not sure what benefit is supposed to be had from it.
Didn't watch any tennis yesterday so it didn't effect me. Sure Serena's been on Centre Court enough times in the past anyway.
Didn't read the article, but in the earlier rounds it was clear the court selection was based on looks alone.There's no reason to put Kirilenko and Dulko on Centre Court other than their looks though.How does 'Semi Finals' = earlier rounds
Was disgusting. Barely commentated about the match.Seems like the comms were just counting down till Hewitt Roddick match...
Murray's game has been good enough to win many tournaments, and beat Roger, Novak and Nadal before.Cant imagine either of these guys winning it though - games simply arent big enough
Didn't read the article, but in the earlier rounds it was clear the court selection was based on looks alone.There's no reason to put Kirilenko and Dulko on Centre Court other than their looks though.
As I posted earlier in the thread, this article was pretty good IMO: Sets appeal: beauty aces talent at Wimbledon - Sport - theage.com.au