Really? I thought Simmons was actually an opener. 'Twas why I was disappointed he was picked down the order in his debut Test.Simmons has the potential to be even more Ganga-like than Smith though. Smith's actually an opener; both Ganga and Simmons are upper-middle-order players who have been shoved up to open because they look like they're technically suited to it.
Seriously, how much longer do we have to put-up with this rubbish for?
Woohoo, at last. Is this perma?Catch.
I read somewhere (cricinfo I'm pretty sure) that his preference is to bat 3 or 4, but that he's spent a lot of time opening as well and is comfortable with it. Which sounds a lot like Ganga to me.Really? I thought Simmons was actually an opener. 'Twas why I was disappointed he was picked down the order in his debut Test.
Six months.Woohoo, at last. Is this perma?
Panesar is loved by the media and they don't like Onions as he's an unfashionable Durham player(TM) (Bresnan not much more fashionable either, but he's bound to be picked I'd have thought) - so it's a no-brainer for them who they want in the side.There seems to be a bit of a groundswell of support in the press behind the idea of playing two spinners. Just what has Monty Panesar done to deserve a place in the squad let alone the XI? He's taken 3 first class wickets in 3 games at an average approaching 90.
I doubt there are may instances he actually played fro Northants as he was permanently with England on tour wasn't he?Seriously, when was the last time MSP did anything much of note for Northants?
I can't remember him doing so since 2005.
He won't have played that much 2006-2009, but it's definately more than never.I doubt there are may instances he actually played fro Northants as he was permanently with England on tour wasn't he?
Why is that? This is not meant to defend him, but more on a vaguely related note, my brother saw Bernard bowl on some SkySports News highlights and said he looks a handy bowler.
Agreed, Bernard is actually quite a handly bowler and can swing it if condition are right, suppose this wont come to the fore much in the first test but could do in the second. Despite being an average bat he is as close to Bravo as we have right now.Beggars can't be choosers - if Bernard is the best we have to fill the current gap in the WI lineup, then I say, give him a chance!
An extreme joke was this. The reason for Bravo's exclusion was that his 'body wasn't up to 5 day cricket' don't really see how that works when he is conveniently fine to play a bunch of games in the IPL. I know they're different games but he's been back a while now and is surely ready for some test cricket.I doubt there are may instances he actually played fro Northants as he was permanently with England on tour wasn't he?
And is Dwayne Brave touring? Windies could benefit from his seam and semi-good batting
If the IPL moves to March/April, that would be much better....I don't think there will be a problem with clashes in the future, I understand the IPL is going to be moved to earlier in the year, to March/April.
Money aside, the IPL is still the best thing for Bravo. The World T20 is more important for the WI than this test series, so it's important that Bravo is fit and firing for that.
DWTA.I don't think there will be a problem with clashes in the future, I understand the IPL is going to be moved to earlier in the year, to March/April.
Money aside, the IPL is still the best thing for Bravo. The World T20 is more important for the WI than this test series, so it's important that Bravo is fit and firing for that.