• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** IPL 2009

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Maybe. I'm not sure about that. They've handled Murali well, and while India were owned by him in the Test series, they've started playing him much better. I'd think the Aussie team could too.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Haven't seen many Australian one-dayers recently?
Ah one-dayers - I was thinking Tests. Yea, he'd do well I think, because both him and Murali can keep it tight. I really have no clue what was going on last game vs. Pakistan. They are better than that - they kept on getting bowled!
 

TT Boy

Hall of Fame Member
Maybe. I'm not sure about that. They've handled Murali well, and while India were owned by him in the Test series, they've started playing him much better. I'd think the Aussie team could too.
Different side (though, not vastly in complextion) and one of their best players of spin has retired. Afridi is no mystery bowler (been playing for over 12 years) but they couldn't pick his googly yesterday or counter the drift he got.
 

TT Boy

Hall of Fame Member
Ah one-dayers - I was thinking Tests. Yea, he'd do well I think, because both him and Murali can keep it tight. I really have no clue what was going on last game vs. Pakistan. They are better than that - they kept on getting bowled!
Where Paul Harris just recorded he's best test figures and enjoyed a rather fruitful home and away series, on wickets which hardly conducive to spin.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
He could easily have taken a single to take strike in the next over. There were other options to hit around- Ganguly was bowling at the other end, and they are stuck with the likes of Agarkar and Anureet. There was no need to go for a big hit so early.

This is why Indians don't score centuries in T20. Absolutely stupid shot-selection.
I don't know if Yusuf Pathan is even capable of scoring a century without a massive amount of luck. Were he to try to stick around and play a long innings, he probably wouldn't score any more runs, he'd just score them slower. If it were someone like Tendulkar, Ganguly or Badrinath I'd be completely in agreement with you. But i think in Pathan's case you're wanting him to be something he's not.
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
Royals have done well to maintain a decent run rate given their batting. Have a real chance for a 150 which is a competitive total and some thing you can bowl with. I would still fancy KKR to win though.
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
Top over by young Anureet mixing his pace up. Finished off with a good yorker to take the wicket.

Interesting that Bangar hasn't been given a bowl this inning. He is playing as a specialist bat.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Pretty poor batting from Rajasthan i thought. Mendis aside the KKR bowling was nothing special. Somehow they've got an eminently defendable target though. Considering bowling is their stronger suit and KKR are chasing under lights, they've given themselves a chance. But given batting direness often rubs off on bowlers, I don't think they'll do it.
 

Top