Saffies were just taking the longer view, obv. Along the lines of "Christ he's gotta mis-hit one of them, right?"Serving mid-height bouncers up to Ponting was of course always going to work...
Another Englishman confused by the concept of actually having a massive first innings lead I seeLast 10 ovs 14/0 RR 1.40
Ouch. Australia should be really getting on with it.
Ponting will be disappointed. Should have had 2 centuries already this series.
At that stage he was nowhere near the Test side so I was right, we were both right really and ****ing eat me.
http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/1507973-post2566.htmlAt that stage he was nowhere near the Test side so I was right, we were both right really and ****ing eat me.
Pretty sure he'll break Lawrence Rowe's record, yeah.Would Hughes be the youngest Test Cricketer to make twin centuries in a Test Match? Sorry if TV/Radio coverage has mentioned this I'm at work, but about to take a break so I can see him reach his 100!!
Johnson. Hughes' innings has been quite painful to watch at times. Johnson is exciting.I hope Hughes gets his 2nd 100, but it will bring up a huge dilemma;
Who is our new 'favourite person in the world'?
Johnson or Hughes?
Yeah the youngest ever, breaks George Headley's record from 1929.Would Hughes be the youngest Test Cricketer to make twin centuries in a Test Match? Sorry if TV/Radio coverage has mentioned this I'm at work, but about to take a break so I can see him reach his 100!!
Plus the 99 at Melb, could be one away from Tendulkar if a few things went differently.Ponting will be disappointed. Should have had 2 centuries already this series.
Radio been adamant for hours that Headley was the youngest. Hughes 200 days his junior.Pretty sure he'll break Lawrence Rowe's record, yeah.
First innings a lot better though, that was the one which set up the match. Not much pressure exerted by the saffers in the second, they look a demoralised bunch.Plus the 99 at Melb, could be one away from Tendulkar if a few things went differently.
Hughes. Star.