• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Kallis Vs Sobers

The better allrounder?


  • Total voters
    173

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
The Wisden poll is an excellent call Mr Z and an interesting one in the light of some of the threads that have appeared on CW

As you say the "electorate" was 100 - Bradman was voted for by all 100 and Sobers 90 - no one else got close to those two - Jack Hobbs was way back in 3rd with 30 - of the other "great all rounders" it was

Hadlee 13
Imran 13
Botham 9
Kapil 5

and Keith Miller? - perhaps surprisingly none at all
 

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I thought they were removed at birth. :huh:
Not according to the man himself - he says he got rid of one at about 11/12 using a length of catgut and a sharp tug and the other at 14/15 using a knife - it does seem rather extraordinary but I can't see why he'd lie about it
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
It's been fairly rare for spin in India to fit the description "mostly useless". There's obviously been isolated Tests here and there on pitches that have offered nothing to any bowler, but more Indian Test pitches than not down the years tended to turn, if not always all through the match.
 

Precambrian

Banned
Sobers, its closer than some may expect, but its still an easy choice. Nothing against Kallis of course, he is a giant (literally and figuratively).

Its certainly a more worthy debate than Sobers v Miller or Sobers v Imran though.



This is a great point, zaremba.
:yawn: Not another of the everything's gold in black and white worshippers. Seriously???
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Not according to the man himself - he says he got rid of one at about 11/12 using a length of catgut and a sharp tug and the other at 14/15 using a knife - it does seem rather extraordinary but I can't see why he'd lie about it
:sick:

And what's more, not sure why on Earth he'd want to get rid of them. :huh: Surely he was playing cricket from a very early age - surely he'd realise that a sixth finger on the bowling hand (and possibly on the bat on both hands) would be a huge advantage?
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
The Wisden poll is an excellent call Mr Z and an interesting one in the light of some of the threads that have appeared on CW

As you say the "electorate" was 100 - Bradman was voted for by all 100 and Sobers 90 - no one else got close to those two - Jack Hobbs was way back in 3rd with 30 - of the other "great all rounders" it was

Hadlee 13
Imran 13
Botham 9
Kapil 5

and Keith Miller? - perhaps surprisingly none at all
The Wisden Poll has been discussed before. The ten that didn't vote for Sobers did so not because they don't rate him but because they knew he was bound to finish second and they wanted to boost the tally of their other favourite players.. Of course no one wanted to be seen not to vote for the Don.
 

Precambrian

Banned
It's been fairly rare for spin in India to fit the description "mostly useless". There's obviously been isolated Tests here and there on pitches that have offered nothing to any bowler, but more Indian Test pitches than not down the years tended to turn, if not always all through the match.
The perception has come from India relying on spinners more in the course of history. The truth is Indian pitches have ranged from everything to everything. But perception and pre conceived bias sees only the results they want to. Indian pitches have been greentops, eggheads, dustbowls, mysterious, etc etc. It is very hard to find a common theme.
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
:sick:

And what's more, not sure why on Earth he'd want to get rid of them. :huh: Surely he was playing cricket from a very early age - surely he'd realise that a sixth finger on the bowling hand (and possibly on the bat on both hands) would be a huge advantage?
I've seen people with these so called extra fingers and it's usually little more than a tiny stub which is of no help in any walk of life - except a circus freak show.
 

JBH001

International Regular
:yawn: Not another of the everything's gold in black and white worshippers. Seriously???
8-)

Never been a 'black and white' merchant. But that does not disguise the fact that sometimes there are black and whites, and talking about 'greys' for the sake of it merely serves to cloud what is essentially a clear cut issue. Not that you are being successful where that is concerned either.
 
Last edited:

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
I imagine Precamb meant, by that post, that you are someone who favours what appears these days on our screens in black-and-white. May be wrong.
 

JBH001

International Regular
Jeez, spare me the CW smart alec bull****. 8-)

Time to leave this asinine little thread.
 

Evermind

International Debutant
Wouldn't Sobers vs Imran have been a better poll?
Imran > Kallis as allrounders go.
I think this is a better poll because they're both essentially batting all-rounders.

Though Kallis' bowling average is better than Flintoff's - a supposed "bowling" all-rounder. Not trying to take a shot, just remarking.
 

Top