dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
Nah, shush. That's what everyone was saying about Watson...At least he's not injured constantly any more.
Nah, shush. That's what everyone was saying about Watson...At least he's not injured constantly any more.
Hopes will and should open before Haddin.Symonds, Lee and Watson will be out.
Marsh
Haddin
Ponting
Clarke
Hussey
Hussey
Hopes
Johnson
Hauritz
Bracken
Hilfenhaus
Has had them develop every two years, almost like clockwork, since he was 14. This despite changing his action almost every time. Personally, that's evidence enough he's just not built to bowl quick, no matter how many benchpresses he does. I'd be considering cutting back on the speed or doing away with the bowling entirely. It just sets him back so far and while he has the potential to be a decent Test bat, I don't think his bowling will ever be world-class, short bursts of good form notwithstanding.watson's had stress fractures before though hasn't he ? i thought these days they ironed out any problems in a bowling action once it's happened once, sometimes before it even happens. maybe he picked up some bad habits again, was cooley paying attention ?
I violently disagree...Hopes will and should open before Haddin.
Yeah but it's about a new stress fracture this time.It's almost like I've read that exact post before.
Oh wait, I have.
Yeah, I mean, Haddin hit a hundred opening for NSW about 10 years ago with Mark Waugh, he should certainly open ahead of someone who does it successfully week-in, week-out.I violently disagree...
[insert quip about having read this before and such]Yeah, I mean, Haddin hit a hundred opening for NSW about 10 years ago with Mark Waugh, he should certainly open ahead of someone who does it successfully week-in, week-out.
Everyone here saying Haddin should open is absolutely off their rocker. Have any of you seen him bat before? People seem to think that if someone uses a straight bat, they're an opener. Haddin plays away from his body to the pacemen and is troubled by swing early on in his innings, him opening is a terrible idea.
Have never gone that in depth tbh, which says something about how lazy I am because it's not very analytical.[insert quip about having read this before and such]
I've read the Mark Waugh bit before.Have never gone that in depth tbh, which says something about how lazy I am because it's not very analytical.
Yeah, I agree with this strongly.Yeah, I mean, Haddin hit a hundred opening for NSW about 10 years ago with Mark Waugh, he should certainly open ahead of someone who does it successfully week-in, week-out.
Everyone here saying Haddin should open is absolutely off their rocker. Have any of you seen him bat before? People seem to think that if someone uses a straight bat, they're an opener. Haddin plays away from his body to the pacemen and is troubled by swing early on in his innings, him opening is a terrible idea.
Yeah I'm fairly sure they were. I think a lot of the myth around his opening ability comes from the fact that the times he did well opening were frequently the old Saturday Mercatile Mutual Cup games on 9.I think all his big , better than run-a-ball tons opening were at North Sydney
You obviously feel very strongly about this issue.Yeah, I mean, Haddin hit a hundred opening for NSW about 10 years ago with Mark Waugh, he should certainly open ahead of someone who does it successfully week-in, week-out.
Everyone here saying Haddin should open is absolutely off their rocker. Have any of you seen him bat before? People seem to think that if someone uses a straight bat, they're an opener. Haddin plays away from his body to the pacemen and is troubled by swing early on in his innings, him opening is a terrible idea.
Does go on about it, tbh.You obviously feel very strongly about this issue.
Violently, if you will.You obviously feel very strongly about this issue.