Seriously, Kaz... The argument is very simple.. 12 tests is a big enough sample and for him to average only 20 IS abysmal.. I don't hold it against him as every player as his own achilles heel BUT the fact is from a purely statistical PoV (obv. I dont believe stats tell much, but that is just me) Ponting's record is less complete than Lara or Sachin..
LMAO, are you reading what I am writing? Let me go over it again very simply:
Ponting:
India: Home 79.35; Away 20.85; Overall 47.02
Sobers:
New Zealand: Home 36.14; Away 15.10; Overall 23.76
So Ponting is more complete than Sobers, right? And if so, then Tendulkar and Lara are more complete than both, right?
It's hard to believe anyone who possesses a simple grasp of mathematics would conclude that Ponting is less complete:
This argument being brought forth is akin to:
Batsman A: Averages 80 in every country but 20 in Country B.
Bastman B: Averages 40 in every country.
So just because in one country Batsman A/Ponting does poorly he is less "complete" even though you are conveniently forgetting that in ALL other instances combined Batsman A/Ponting is
much superior to Batsman B/Tendulkar.
How about thinking it like this: Tendulkar is sub 50 in 5 countries, Ponting is only sub 50 in 3 (and one of them he only played 1 innings against)?
Averaging 30 against a country is poor. Not as poor as 20, but certainly poor for an all-time great - and the distinction between the two is laughable considering neither averages would help their countries out in a test series. Essentially, you are stacking up 1 away country for Ponting and saying that is STILL poorer than Tendulkar who averages in the 30s both home and away against S.Africa. When even mathematically, Ponting's worst test country is STILL by way some way stronger than Tendulkar's worst. (47 vs 35). Let's not even start on Lara who averages in the 30s away at TWO countries and averages in the 30s overall against India.