roseboy64
Cricket Web Content Updater
Since when?Isaksson is a PSV player.
Friedel's a fair gun tbh.
Since when?Isaksson is a PSV player.
Friedel's a fair gun tbh.
Ind33d, I was merely pointing out that the amount of debt a club has doesn't neccesarily have any bearing on their spending if they are wealthy enough, which Man Utd clearly are, whether or not they "bought" the league so to speak, is another matter entirely.Not really relevant since Liverpool's wealthier than you as well.
A debt does not neccesarily mean that your balance is in the red, it could be that Man Utd owe about $40m and are paying it in lumps of about £300k a month till 20XX, during which time their bank balance could well be above £80m at all times, or in all reailty, a hell of al ot more.If they're in debt though, how wealthy are they?
Not true, Man Utd make a hell of a lot through marketing, particularly in the USA and the far east, which wouldnt take a huge bump even if the team went slightly off the rails.Man Utd's debt though requires near constant success.
Think he's still on holiday now. Will sign when he returns for pre-season apparently.Has Samir Nasri joined Arsenal or not?
To be honest I reckon if we failed to qualify for the Champions League one year we would be in big trouble. The kind of decline we had 2004-2006 isn't really going to hurt us though.Not true, Man Utd make a hell of a lot through marketing, particularly in the USA and the far east, which wouldnt take a huge bump even if the team went slightly off the rails.
What about all the TV money, merchandise etc.? That must be worth a fair bit.
It's massive debt and more has been added to it IIRC. Simply put, those resources don't add up to much when you consider that the huge transfer fees and wages, plus maintenance and the like. Add the debt to that and it's not so clear cut. Basically, I mean that a constant stream of success is necessary to facilitate that merchandising and the like. Trophies give more prestige and attract more followers. Too big a drop in revenue from any of those sources following a bit of trophyless seasons and the debt becomes harder to pay off. Plus the club itself pays that debt, not the Glazers so the club needs to continue making lots of money to service it and keep everything running.Not true, Man Utd make a hell of a lot through marketing, particularly in the USA and the far east, which wouldnt take a huge bump even if the team went slightly off the rails.
He's certainly done a lot and would be missed but an adequate replacement could be found. Still, would prefer him to stay of course.Do you Mancs think it will hurt you if Queiroz goes to Portgual, as seems to be likely? Seem to recall you didn't win a single title in his previous absence, not saying that was the reason why just throwing it out there.
Yeah, it'd have an impact, if a replacement was not found the impact would be more long term IMO, as the main strength of Quieroz seems to be the development of prospects from overseas.Do you Mancs think it will hurt you if Queiroz goes to Portgual, as seems to be likely? Seem to recall you didn't win a single title in his previous absence, not saying that was the reason why just throwing it out there.
Friedel is the eleventh best goal keeper of all-time.http://www.goal.com/en/Articolo.aspx?ContenutoId=765483
I'll absolutely explode if this happens.
"Oh we've got two of the bes young keepers in the country at the moment, let's buy an old American **** just cause we're m8's"