Or if he took that break point earlier in the set.The only way Federer was gonna win that last set is if Wimbledon had a fifth set tiebreaker.
Watching these two play was like watching two massive rocks pound at eachother, with nothing giving way.Federer's errors finally cost him
He'll view that as a match he should've won
What he said. The best tennis match in eons, dissapointed for Fed but massive respect for Rafa, truly deserved it and finally ground Fed down. Amazing stuffOne of the greatest sporting moments I've been privileged enough to witness, even on television.
Just a superb spectacle, regardless of whether or not you even like tennis. Federer's astonishing ability to keep pulling aces out of the bag at break point down was something I won't forget. Even while clearly not playing at his best, he just refused to be beaten. For Nadal to overcome a man like that speaks volumes about the caliber of his tennis, and the strength of his spirit. Congratulations, Rafa.
You did kinda... Nobody's won Wimbledon and the French in the same year since Borg in 1980.Fair play to Nadal. The better man on the day won. Federer had the honour of going out on his shield like the champion he is tho. Bit gutted still, would've liked to see history made.
Not quite on the same level as 6 Wimbledons on the bounce tho, you have to say.You did kinda... Nobody's won Wimbledon and the French in the same year since Borg in 1980.
Yeah, our mate Billy Renshaw. Would've been an Open era record tho.Well, he kinda had to win 7 in a row really.
Point to note - Roger was not able to hold his serve 3 times in those 2 sets. So not really simple even with your criteria.Yes it is. If Player A is holding serve comfortably and taking Player B to break points often, but is unable to break. Simple as.